From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tengda Wu" <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/23] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 13:05:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260808130502.02EA31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260808122400.2961238-4-wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] arch->objdump.memory_ref_char is uninitialized (0) for ARM64, causing arm64__check_multi_regs() to fail parsing memory operands and creating an out-of-bounds read risk.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 03/23] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions ---
commit 0546b270cb844bdab4fcf529e313bb0ead4fc3f8
Author: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions
As the default parser for arm64 instructions, arm64_mov__parse()
currently only supports parsing instructions with the 'addr <symbol>'
suffix. Other instructions are not supported, causing a lack of
source and target information for most regular instructions.
Generalize arm64_mov__parse to extend its parsing capabilities:
1. Parse 'ops->target.raw' and 'ops->source.raw' by default.
2. Utilize arm64__check_multi_regs() to identify if source and
target contain multiple registers.
3. Maintain backward compatibility for instructions containing the
'addr <symbol>' suffix.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> index 33080fdca125f..5e824fd617ee5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
[ ... ]
> +static bool arm64__check_multi_regs(const struct arch *arch, const char *op)
> +{
> + const char *p = op;
> + int reg_count = 0;
> +
> + while (p && *p) {
> + p = skip_spaces(p);
> + if (*p == arch->objdump.memory_ref_char)
> + p++;
[Severity: Medium]
Could this result in an out-of-bounds read?
Since arch->objdump.memory_ref_char is not explicitly initialized for ARM64,
it defaults to 0. If the operand string contains trailing spaces,
skip_spaces() will advance p to the null terminator.
This would cause the following check to match:
if (*p == arch->objdump.memory_ref_char) /* 0 == 0 */
p++;
This increments p past the null terminator, and the subsequent call to
arm64__is_reg(p) would access unallocated memory:
static bool arm64__is_reg(const char *op)
{
...
if ((op[0] == 'x' || op[0] == 'w') && isdigit(op[1]))
...
Should memory_ref_char be initialized to '[' for ARM64 so that memory
operands are correctly parsed?
> +
> + if (arm64__is_reg(p))
> + reg_count++;
> +
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260808122400.2961238-1-wutengda@huaweicloud.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 12:23 [PATCH v4 00/23] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-08-10 13:08 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] perf annotate: Deduplicate overlapping ARM SPE events for data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-08-10 6:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] perf arm-spe: Set default synthesized event period to 1 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] perf annotate-data: Extract invalidate_reg_state() as a common helper Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] perf annotate-arm64: Track return type after call instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] perf annotate-data: Expand type_state_reg imm_value to u64 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] perf annotate-data: Track imm_value for stack variables Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:24 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:20 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260808130502.02EA31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox