From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tengda Wu" <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/23] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() for arm64
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 13:07:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260808130708.749031F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260808122400.2961238-7-wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The patch's fix to enable arm64 register parsing is unreachable and ineffective because the callers still unconditionally require a register prefix.
- [Medium] The new optional prefix logic in `arch__dwarf_regnum()` fails to strip the opening bracket from memory operands.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v4 06/23] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() for arm64 ---
commit 1ed2e0e5199a9033fdb64817a106aecaa0871796
Author: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() for arm64
This commit makes the register prefix check in arch__dwarf_regnum() optional
to support arm64 assembly syntax. It also extends the delimiter set in
strpbrk() to handle bracketed memory operands and removes the static
qualifier from arch__dwarf_regnum().
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index df70e95a84704..9d8b4d6b859b8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2472,21 +2472,23 @@ int annotate_check_args(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int arch__dwarf_regnum(const struct arch *arch, const char *str)
> +int arch__dwarf_regnum(const struct arch *arch, const char *str)
[Severity: Medium]
Does this change fully enable arm64 register parsing?
Looking at the callers of arch__dwarf_regnum(), they appear to still
unconditionally enforce the presence of a register prefix character.
For example, extract_reg_offset() checks:
if (arch->objdump.register_char == 0)
return -1;
And annotate_get_insn_location() strictly requires a match:
if (*s == arch->objdump.register_char) {
op_loc->reg1 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, s);
}
Will these un-updated callers prevent arm64 registers from actually being
parsed?
> {
> - const char *p;
> + const char *p = str;
> char *regname, *q;
> int reg;
>
> - p = strchr(str, arch->objdump.register_char);
> - if (p == NULL)
> - return -1;
> + if (arch->objdump.register_char) {
> + p = strchr(str, arch->objdump.register_char);
> + if (p == NULL)
> + return -1;
> + }
>
> regname = strdup(p);
> if (regname == NULL)
> return -1;
>
> - q = strpbrk(regname, ",) ");
> + q = strpbrk(regname, ",)] ");
[Severity: Medium]
Since the prefix check is now optional, will p point to the opening bracket
for arm64 memory operands like [x2, #8]?
This strpbrk() strips the closing bracket ], but is there logic to strip the
leading [ before the string is passed to get_dwarf_regnum()? Can this pass
[x2 as the register name and cause it to be rejected?
> if (q)
> *q = '\0';
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260808122400.2961238-1-wutengda@huaweicloud.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 12:23 [PATCH v4 00/23] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] perf annotate: Deduplicate overlapping ARM SPE events for data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-08-10 6:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] perf arm-spe: Set default synthesized event period to 1 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] perf annotate-data: Extract invalidate_reg_state() as a common helper Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] perf annotate-arm64: Track return type after call instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] perf annotate-data: Expand type_state_reg imm_value to u64 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] perf annotate-data: Track imm_value for stack variables Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:24 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:20 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260808130708.749031F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox