* [PATCH] perf: Fix mmap_count accounting on the perf_mmap_close() race path
@ 2026-08-30 14:55 Aohan Mei
2026-08-30 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Aohan Mei @ 2026-08-30 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Namhyung Kim
Cc: Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Ian Rogers,
Adrian Hunter, James Clark, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel,
Aohan Mei, TencentOS Corvus AI, stable
From: Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>
perf_mmap_rb()'s raced path (a concurrent perf_mmap_close() has dropped
rb->mmap_count to 0 but is still blocked on event->mmap_mutex inside
refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock()) installs a fresh ring buffer and then
does refcount_set(&event->mmap_count, 1).
That is wrong: the blocked closer still holds a pending decrement and
the count is 1 at this point. The refcount_set() leaves the count at 1,
so once perf_mmap() drops the mutex the closer observes a 1->0
transition, detaches the *new* buffer via ring_buffer_attach(event,
NULL) and drops its last reference, freeing pages that the racing
mmap() is about to map. A later munmap() of that mapping then finds
event->rb == NULL and crashes the kernel in perf_mmap_close().
Restore the pre-59741451b49c accounting on the raced path: the count is
guaranteed non-zero there, because the closer's decrement of
event->mmap_count only happens while holding mmap_mutex, which the
mapper holds. Use refcount_inc(). Keep refcount_set(..., 1) for the
genuine first mmap, where the 0->1 transition is required and
refcount_inc() would WARN.
Fixes: 59741451b49c ("perf: Identify the 0->1 transition for event::mmap_count")
Reported-by: TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: CodeBuddy:Kimi-K3
Signed-off-by: Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 4638544205f2..adcc04ca05f8 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7273,6 +7273,7 @@ static int perf_mmap_rb(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct perf_event *event,
long extra = 0, user_extra = nr_pages;
struct perf_buffer *rb;
int rb_flags = 0;
+ bool raced = false;
nr_pages -= 1;
@@ -7314,6 +7315,7 @@ static int perf_mmap_rb(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct perf_event *event,
* event and continue as if !event->rb
*/
ring_buffer_attach(event, NULL);
+ raced = true;
}
if (!perf_mmap_calc_limits(vma, &user_extra, &extra))
@@ -7338,7 +7340,21 @@ static int perf_mmap_rb(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct perf_event *event,
perf_event_update_userpage(event);
perf_mmap_account(vma, user_extra, extra);
- refcount_set(&event->mmap_count, 1);
+
+ /*
+ * On the raced path above, a concurrent perf_mmap_close() can
+ * still have a pending decrement of event->mmap_count: it sits
+ * blocked inside refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock() on event->mmap_mutex
+ * (which we hold) with the count still at 1. Using
+ * refcount_set(..., 1) here would make that closer observe a 1->0
+ * transition once we drop the mutex, causing it to detach and free
+ * the buffer we just installed, while this mmap() still maps it.
+ * The count is guaranteed non-zero on the raced path, so increment.
+ */
+ if (raced)
+ refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count);
+ else
+ refcount_set(&event->mmap_count, 1);
return 0;
}
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix mmap_count accounting on the perf_mmap_close() race path
2026-08-30 14:55 [PATCH] perf: Fix mmap_count accounting on the perf_mmap_close() race path Aohan Mei
@ 2026-08-30 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-30 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aohan Mei; +Cc: linux-perf-users
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Critical] Incrementing event->mmap_count on the raced path causes the concurrent perf_mmap_close() to skip cleanup and unaccounting of the old ring buffer, permanently leaking memory charges and the old ring buffer itself, leading to a Use-After-Free.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] perf_mmap_aux() lacks protection against mmaping redirected events, causing a refcount saturation WARN on event->mmap_count.
- [High] Mmapping the same perf event multiple times permanently leaks locked_vm and pinned_vm accounting charges.
--
commit 74767b5c0f42ab023d9f220cb4e3a861a837fda1
Author: Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>
perf: Fix mmap_count accounting on the perf_mmap_close() race path
This patch aims to fix an issue on the perf_mmap_rb() raced path where
a concurrent perf_mmap_close() has dropped the ring buffer's mmap_count to
zero. It restores the previous behavior of incrementing event->mmap_count
instead of setting it to 1, to prevent the concurrent closer from observing
a 1->0 transition and prematurely freeing the new buffer.
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index a6c8e38a31104..7b55156bbc023 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -7281,6 +7281,7 @@ static int perf_mmap_rb(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct perf_event *event,
> long extra = 0, user_extra = nr_pages;
> struct perf_buffer *rb;
> int rb_flags = 0;
> + bool raced = false;
>
> nr_pages -= 1;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could mmapping the same perf event multiple
times permanently leak locked_vm and pinned_vm accounting charges?
When perf_mmap_rb() handles overlapping alias mappings (just before the raced
path check), it calls perf_mmap_account() for each mapping.
However, during teardown in perf_mmap_close(), perf_mmap_unaccount() is only
called once when the final mapping is unmapped and detach_rest is true. For
all prior munmap() calls, the unaccounting seems to be completely skipped
because detach_rest is false.
Could a user exhaust their RLIMIT_MEMLOCK quota by repeatedly mmapping and
munmapping the same perf event?
[ ... ]
> @@ -7346,7 +7348,21 @@ static int perf_mmap_rb(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct perf_event *event,
> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
>
> perf_mmap_account(vma, user_extra, extra);
> - refcount_set(&event->mmap_count, 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * On the raced path above, a concurrent perf_mmap_close() can
> + * still have a pending decrement of event->mmap_count: it sits
> + * blocked inside refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock() on event->mmap_mutex
> + * (which we hold) with the count still at 1. Using
> + * refcount_set(..., 1) here would make that closer observe a 1->0
> + * transition once we drop the mutex, causing it to detach and free
> + * the buffer we just installed, while this mmap() still maps it.
> + * The count is guaranteed non-zero on the raced path, so increment.
> + */
> + if (raced)
> + refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count);
[Severity: Critical]
Might incrementing event->mmap_count on the raced path inadvertently break the
teardown logic in the racing closer?
By inflating the count from 1 to 2, the concurrent perf_mmap_close() for the
old ring buffer might see refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock() return false. This
would cause it to jump directly to the out_put label, completely skipping the
detachment of other events from old_rb->event_list and skipping
perf_mmap_unaccount().
Would this cause the old_rb to be freed while other events are still attached,
leading to a use-after-free if those events attempt to write to the freed
buffer? Does this also permanently leak memory charges since the unaccounting
is skipped?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but it appears perf_mmap_aux()
lacks protection against mmapping redirected events. Could this lead to a
refcount saturation WARN?
In perf_mmap_aux(), the code validates that an rb exists but seems to fail to
verify if the event actually owns the mmap count via a check like
!refcount_read(&event->mmap_count). It unconditionally calls
refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count).
If a user redirects event B's output to event A via
ioctl(PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT), setting B->mmap_count to 0, and then calls
mmap() on event B with a non-zero offset, will this cause a refcount
saturation WARN?
> + else
> + refcount_set(&event->mmap_count, 1);
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260830145512.2583689-1-ljp1205831794@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-30 15:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-30 14:55 [PATCH] perf: Fix mmap_count accounting on the perf_mmap_close() race path Aohan Mei
2026-08-30 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox