From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf report: Add --no-progress option
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:28:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929212801.D97341F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929212246.2532021-4-acme@kernel.org>
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
>
> Add the counterpart of --progress: the TUI and GTK browsers present
> progress of their own and there is no way to turn it off, while the
> option just added allows asking for it when there is none. Install the
> no-op ui_progress ops, the ones already used until a backend sets
> theirs, after setup_browser() installed them. The phases are still
> counted, nothing is shown for them, and --no-progress takes precedence
> over --progress.
>
> Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260929212246.2532021-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 21:22 [PATCH v5 0/5] perf tools: Add progress diagnostics and a false-sharing workload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-29 21:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf config: Move perf_config__set_variable() to util/config.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-29 21:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 21:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf report: Add --progress option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-29 21:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 21:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf report: Add --no-progress option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-29 21:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-29 23:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-09-29 21:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf scripts: Add perf-stuck, to tell where a running perf is stuck Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-29 21:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 21:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf test: Add false_sharing workload exhibiting cross-CPU false sharing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-29 21:28 ` sashiko-bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-29 20:15 [PATCH v4 0/5] perf tools: Add progress diagnostics and a false-sharing workload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-29 20:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf report: Add --no-progress option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-29 20:24 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929212801.D97341F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox