From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
eranian@google.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/3] perf/x86/intel: Support PEBS counters snapshotting
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:55:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d63f8b2-c028-4cae-ad72-76378425c73a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241218163249.GI2354@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2024-12-18 11:32 a.m., Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 07:16:43AM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>
>> To prevent the case that a PEBS record value might be in the past
>> relative to what is already in the event, perf always stops the PMU and
>> drains the PEBS buffer before updating the corresponding event->count.
>
> Like I wrote here:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241218082404.GI11133@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
>
> I don't think this is sufficient.
I replied with an explanation this morning in the old V5 thread. I'm not
sure if you got a chance to look at it.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/5a4ab06e-8628-4e1d-addb-2af920deffad@linux.intel.com/
There will be a drain_pebs() right before handling A-overflow-PMI.
B-assist A=1
C A=2
B-assist A=3
<- drain_pebs()
A-overflow-PMI A=4
C-assist-PMI (DS buffer) A=5
So the A-overflow-PMI will
- Process the DS. adjust A->count to 3
- adjust A->count to 4
Is it sufficient?
If not, could you please share more details?
Thanks,
Kan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 15:16 [PATCH V6 1/3] perf/x86/intel/ds: Add PEBS format 6 kan.liang
2024-12-18 15:16 ` [PATCH V6 2/3] perf: Extend perf_output_read kan.liang
2024-12-19 22:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-20 0:42 ` Liang, Kan
2024-12-18 15:16 ` [PATCH V6 3/3] perf/x86/intel: Support PEBS counters snapshotting kan.liang
2024-12-18 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-18 16:55 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2024-12-18 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-20 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-03 16:15 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d63f8b2-c028-4cae-ad72-76378425c73a@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox