From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Zecheng Li <zli94@ncsu.edu>, <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/21] perf auxtrace: Set default period to 1 for PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS type
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:32:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fa4da51-6fee-450d-915a-eb4c4de03961@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7a94138-e29f-4b1a-948d-ef4933e7d0c5@huaweicloud.com>
On 21/07/2026 14:39, Tengda Wu wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On 2026/7/21 16:08, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 01/07/2026 06:53, Tengda Wu wrote:
>>> When using --itrace=M for data type profiling on arm64, the 'Percent'
>>> values in perf annotate output are all zero:
>>>
>>> Annotate type: 'struct mmu_gather_batch' in [kernel.kallsyms] (15 samples):
>>> ============================================================================
>>> Percent offset size field
>>> 0.00 0 0x10 struct mmu_gather_batch {
>>> 0.00 0 0x8 struct mmu_gather_batch* next;
>>> 0.00 0x8 0x4 unsigned int nr;
>>> 0.00 0xc 0x4 unsigned int max;
>>> 0.00 0x10 0 struct encoded_page*[] encoded_pages;
>>> };
>>>
>>> However, adding the -n option reveals non-zero sample counts:
>>>
>>> Annotate type: 'struct mmu_gather_batch' in [kernel.kallsyms] (15 samples):
>>> ============================================================================
>>> Samples offset size field
>>> 15 0 0x10 struct mmu_gather_batch {
>>> 13 0 0x8 struct mmu_gather_batch* next;
>>> 2 0x8 0x4 unsigned int nr;
>>> 0 0xc 0x4 unsigned int max;
>>> 0 0x10 0 struct encoded_page*[] encoded_pages;
>>> };
>>>
>>> The root cause is that when period is not explicitly specified in the
>>> --itrace option, it remains zero after itrace_do_parse_synth_opts().
>>> The zero period then flows through annotated_data_type__update_samples()
>>> where h->period accumulates to zero, and print_annotated_data_type_value()
>>> calculates the 'Percent' as zero.
>>
>> The period is for instructions samples i.e. options 'i' or 'y'. Why is
>> it being used in the 'M' case? What samples are being synthesized in
>> that case?
>>
>
> The 'M' case is just one example. On arm64, 't' and 'f' also have the
> same percent-zero issue.
>
> How ARM SPE synthesizes events:
>
> ARM SPE can synthesize multiple event types from a single instruction.
> For example, the 'M' case targets instructions that cause memory
> interaction events, while the 't' case targets instructions that trigger
> TLB access/miss events. Users can specify the desired event types via
> the itrace option to obtain corresponding data type profiling results.
>
> How data type computes Percent:
>
> Data type profiling computes Percent based on the period. The flow is as
> follows:
>
> arm_spe_prep_sample():
> sample->period = spe->synth_opts.period;
It seems like only arm-spe has the unusual period handling.
Please make the period non-zero when it is set up in
arm_spe_process_auxtrace_info() and add a comment explaining why.
>
> __hists__add_entry():
> he.stat.period = sample->period;
>
> annotated_data_type__update_samples():
> h->period += period;
> h->addr[offset].period += period;
>
> print_annotated_data_value():
> double percent = h->period ? (100.0 * period / h->period) : 0;
>
> Therefore, if synth_opts.period is not specified (remains zero), the
> final Percent calculation results in zero.
>
> As you pointed out, if period is intended to be limited to only the 'i'
> and 'y' options, then setting period to 1 in the current patch may not
> be appropriate.
>
> In fact, within print_annotated_data_value(), Percent could also be
> computed from the sample count. Moreover, I noticed that 'perf annotate'
> already has a --percent-type parameter that allows users to specify
> whether Percent is based on period or hit (which I understand to be the
> sample count). Perhaps it would be more reasonable to adapt
> print_annotated_data_value() to honor the --percent-type parameter
> instead.
>
> Thanks,
> Tengda
>
>>>
>>> In itrace_do_parse_synth_opts(), non-'iy' options have their period
>>> type set to PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS, but period remains zero.
>>> Since a zero period is meaningless for this type, default to 1 (one
>>> sample per instruction).
>>>
>>> With this fix applied, the result is as follows:
>>>
>>> Annotate type: 'struct mmu_gather_batch' in [kernel.kallsyms] (15 samples):
>>> ============================================================================
>>> Percent offset size field
>>> 100.00 0 0x10 struct mmu_gather_batch {
>>> 86.67 0 0x8 struct mmu_gather_batch* next;
>>> 13.33 0x8 0x4 unsigned int nr;
>>> 0.00 0xc 0x4 unsigned int max;
>>> 0.00 0x10 0 struct encoded_page*[] encoded_pages;
>>> };
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
>>> index 0b851f32e98c..415b68a2bba9 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
>>> @@ -1759,6 +1759,12 @@ int itrace_do_parse_synth_opts(struct itrace_synth_opts *synth_opts,
>>> synth_opts->period = PERF_ITRACE_DEFAULT_PERIOD;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (!period_set &&
>>> + synth_opts->period_type == PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS) {
>>> + /* Indicates a sample is taken for every instruction. */
>>> + synth_opts->period = 1;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> out_err:
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 3:53 [PATCH v3 00/21] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] perf capstone: Fix kernel map reference count leak Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 5:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10 21:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 6:44 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 6:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction " Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 6:45 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 6:18 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 7:49 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-16 12:46 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-16 21:07 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 6:57 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:03 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:14 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() " Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:29 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 6:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:36 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] perf annotate: Deduplicate overlapping ARM SPE events for data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 6:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] perf auxtrace: Set default period to 1 for PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS type Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 8:08 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-07-21 11:39 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-22 6:32 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2026-07-22 7:03 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] perf annotate-data: Extract invalidate_reg_state() as a common helper Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:56 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 8:37 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 7:05 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 7:25 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 7:11 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 8:46 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 7:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 8:47 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 8:48 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 7:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 7:42 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 7:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 8:56 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 7:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 5:54 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 8:01 ` Tengda Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fa4da51-6fee-450d-915a-eb4c4de03961@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=kim.phillips@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zli94@ncsu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox