From: "Falcon, Thomas" <thomas.falcon@intel.com>
To: "alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
"dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Rogers, Ian" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: "Chen, Zide" <zide.chen@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mi, Dapeng1" <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
"Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 0/7] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes and optimizations
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:52:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d3bf679605a6216d149a93cb3acbfa4cfa0a38b.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713082734.3162099-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 2026-07-13 at 16:27 +0800, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> Changes since v1:
> - Patch 3/7: Ensure cpuc->pmu is not the static pmu before calling
> hybrid_pmu(cpuc->pmu) in intel_pmu_cpu_dead() (Sashiko).
>
> This series fixes recently found x86 core PMU bugs. Most of bugs are
> found by Sashiko in reviewing the "Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers
> sampling for perf" patch-set, e.g.,
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260706022123.480411F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260706021852.DE2ED1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
>
> The last patch 7/7 optimizes ACR handling in match_prev_assignment()
> and
> mitigate the performance overhead.
Other than the typo in a comment in patch 6/7, LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com>
>
> Tests:
> Below test cases are run on Diamonds and Novalake. No issues are
> found.
> - Perf stat test
> $ perf test 119
> - Perf record tests
> $ perf test 155
> - Perf record LBR tests
> $ perf test 156
>
> History:
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260710065128.1799838-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/
>
> Dapeng Mi (7):
> perf/x86: Unregister PMI handler on PMU init failure
> perf/x86: Free hybrid state on PMU init failure
> perf/x86: Guard intel_pmu_cpu_dead() against invalid hybrid PMU
> casts
> perf/x86/intel: Unwind cpuc state if PEBS buffer setup fails
> perf/x86: Remove stale fixed counter helper and fix hybrid PMU
> access
> perf/x86/intel: Fix intel_cap handling on hybrid PMUs
> perf/x86: Optimize ACR handling in match_prev_assignment()
>
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> --
> arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 12 ++-----
> 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: edda9051e267b7390c7ce24b1b71434414ad156e
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 8:27 [Patch v2 0/7] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes and optimizations Dapeng Mi
2026-07-13 8:27 ` [Patch v2 1/7] perf/x86: Unregister PMI handler on PMU init failure Dapeng Mi
2026-07-13 8:27 ` [Patch v2 2/7] perf/x86: Free hybrid state " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-13 8:27 ` [Patch v2 3/7] perf/x86: Guard intel_pmu_cpu_dead() against invalid hybrid PMU casts Dapeng Mi
2026-07-13 8:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 8:27 ` [Patch v2 4/7] perf/x86/intel: Unwind cpuc state if PEBS buffer setup fails Dapeng Mi
2026-07-13 8:27 ` [Patch v2 5/7] perf/x86: Remove stale fixed counter helper and fix hybrid PMU access Dapeng Mi
2026-07-13 8:27 ` [Patch v2 6/7] perf/x86/intel: Fix intel_cap handling on hybrid PMUs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-15 14:25 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-07-13 8:27 ` [Patch v2 7/7] perf/x86: Optimize ACR handling in match_prev_assignment() Dapeng Mi
2026-07-15 7:27 ` [Patch v2 0/7] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes and optimizations Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-15 14:52 ` Falcon, Thomas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d3bf679605a6216d149a93cb3acbfa4cfa0a38b.camel@intel.com \
--to=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox