From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
sashiko@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] perf debuginfo: Fix libdw API contract violations
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 14:54:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afjdU9yZ5WYNgyc5@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fUuqcGCgpZApHbqpP8hxs2Y+FYU2W=h1T0D4qgdhOfdBw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 08:26:34AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 3:53 AM <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> > - [Critical] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the open() call in debuginfo__init_offline_dwarf() lacks the O_NONBLOCK flag, exposing a local Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability.
> > --
> >
> > commit a6e339ae66465b909762a437f958cdaed424b666
> > Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> >
> > perf debuginfo: Fix libdw API contract violations
> >
> > This commit adds return value checks for dwfl_report_end and
> > dwfl_module_relocation_info to prevent potential segmentation faults. It also
> > fixes a file descriptor leak in the error path of
> > debuginfo__init_offline_dwarf() when offline initialization fails.
> >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c b/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c
> > > index 0e35c13abd04..84a78b30ceac 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c
> > > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static int debuginfo__init_offline_dwarf(struct debuginfo *dbg,
> > > {
> > > GElf_Addr dummy;
> > > int fd;
> > > + bool fd_consumed = false;
> > >
> > > fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
> >
> > While this wasn't introduced by this patch, could this open() call cause a
> > regression by hanging on a FIFO?
> >
> > If the path originates from user-controlled sources, opening it without
> > O_NONBLOCK can cause the perf record session to hang indefinitely. Using
> > O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK would prevent this.
>
> So this review is bad and based on this prompt:
> https://github.com/masoncl/review-prompts/blob/main/kernel/subsystem/perf.md#file-io-safety-on-untrusted-paths
>
> I'm trying to get the bad prompt removed. The prompt was automatically
> generated from fixes commits when we added O_NONBLOCK to address build
> ID reading hangs, particularly for data mmaps during perf record
> synthesis. We now avoid those hangs by checking for a "regular" file
> with stat. Therefore, the advice regarding O_NONBLOCK and EINTR from
> the prompts is incorrect and does not reflect what the code base does.
>
> Side note: this is the only Sashiko feedback on this series:
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260504081227.2203848-1-irogers%40google.com
I'll process it soon,
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-03 0:35 [PATCH v3 0/6] perf DWARF: Fix libdw API contract violations and crashes Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw segmentation fault in cu_walk_functions_at Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw API contract violations Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] perf libdw: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] perf probe-finder: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] perf annotate-data: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] perf debuginfo: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 2:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] perf DWARF: Fix libdw API contract violations and crashes Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw segmentation fault in cu_walk_functions_at Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 23:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw API contract violations Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 17:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 23:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] perf libdw: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 18:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 23:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] perf probe-finder: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 23:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] perf annotate-data: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 23:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] perf debuginfo: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 23:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] [PATCH v5 0/9] perf DWARF: Fix libdw API contract violations and crashes Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw segmentation fault in cu_walk_functions_at Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw API contract violations Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] perf srcline: Introduce inline_node__clear_frames() Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] perf libdw: Fix callchain parent update in ORDER_CALLER mode Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] perf libdw: Support DWARF line 0 in inline list Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] perf libdw: Fix libdw API contract violations and memory leaks Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] perf probe-finder: Fix libdw API contract violations Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] perf annotate-data: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] perf debuginfo: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 10:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-04 15:26 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 17:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2026-05-04 23:50 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] [PATCH v5 0/9] perf DWARF: Fix libdw API contract violations and crashes Namhyung Kim
2026-05-05 16:29 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-07 8:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-05-06 0:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-07 6:11 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afjdU9yZ5WYNgyc5@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox