From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, mpetlan@redhat.com,
tmricht@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com,
Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com, Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/sched: Update process names of processes in zombie state for both -s and -S options
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 11:17:58 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag8UFqPmRu8v4g_9@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <230801A2-5F9C-42A6-9390-B44786309E30@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 02:02:53PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> > On 27 Apr 2026, at 11:26 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 03:09:30PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >> In redhat perftool testsuite, observed fail for this test:
> >> -- [ FAIL ] -- perf_sched :: test_timehist :: --with-summary (output regexp parsing)
> >>
> >> This led to analysis of "perf sched timehist" summary options.
> >>
> >> # perf sched record -a -o ./perf.data -- sleep 0.1
> >> This will record using perf sched record
> >>
> >> perf sched timeliest has two options "-s" and "-S"
> >> # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -S
> >> -S : Captures summary also at the end
> >>
> >> # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -s
> >> -s : Captures only summary
> >>
> >> The test saves -s result which has only summary and compares with
> >> summary which comes at the end from -S . Since there is a difference
> >> in these two, test fails.
> >>
> >> Checking the behaviour change in -S and -s results, difference is:
> >>
> >> rcu_sched[16] 2 4 0.013 0.001 0.003 0.006 33.23 0
> >> migration/11[73] 2 1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.00 0
> >> migration/3[33] 2 1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.00 0
> >> - :216753[216753] -1 1 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.00 0
> >> + sleep[216753] -1 1 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.00 0
> >> migration/8[58] 2 1 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.00 0
> >> NetworkManager[811] 1 2 0.089 0.028 0.044 0.060 36.06 0
> >> migration/13[83] 2 1 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.00 0
> >>
> >> Here 216753 is pid for sleep which is a zombie process. This is
> >> happening in latest kernel due to an update in "-S" result.
> >> In -S, the process name appears in the results "sleep[216753]",
> >> where as in the -s, only pid is present in the summary result
> >> ":216753[216753]".
> >>
> >> After commit 39f473f6d0b2 ("perf sched timehist: decode process names
> >> of processes in zombie state")
> >> for -S option, if process name is using pid, it uses different way to
> >> set it. So that we get the process name and not just Pid.
> >>
> >> This change went in only for timehist_print_sample() function.
> >> Add this improvement in generic place so that even -s option (which
> >> captures summary) also will have meaningful information.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Namhyung
> Hi,
>
> Can we please have this pulled in, if the patch looks fine ?
Can you please check applying it on top of current perf-tools-next?
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-26 9:39 [PATCH] tools/perf/sched: Update process names of processes in zombie state for both -s and -S options Athira Rajeev
2026-04-27 5:56 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-21 8:32 ` Athira Rajeev
2026-05-21 14:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2026-06-04 14:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-04 15:08 ` Athira Rajeev
2026-06-04 15:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-04-27 6:43 ` Venkat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag8UFqPmRu8v4g_9@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com \
--cc=Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com \
--cc=Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox