From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf kvm: Kill STRDUP_FAIL_EXIT()
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:50:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajq5WwN07wH35012@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623071259.C36A01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 07:12:59AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> New issues:
> - [Medium] Memory leak of dynamically allocated strings in PowerPC default arch events due to removal of array cleanup loops.
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] perf kvm record unconditionally crashes via BUG_ON() on non-Intel x86 hosts and architectures without default events.
> --
>
> commit d3c8251de71559c69211fb2d23ba99dd14669107
> Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> perf kvm: Kill STRDUP_FAIL_EXIT()
>
> This commit removes the STRDUP_FAIL_EXIT macro and replaces dynamically
> allocated copied strings with stack variables for passing command line
> options. It also removes the cleanup loops that freed these string
> copies, addressing a subtle double free issue.
>
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
> > index acc6f2a706b35..477c28915c037 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -2008,9 +2004,9 @@ static int __cmd_record(const char *file_name, int argc, const char **argv)
> [ ... ]
> > for (j = 1; j < argc; j++, i++)
> > - rec_argv[i] = STRDUP_FAIL_EXIT(argv[j]);
> > + rec_argv[i] = argv[j];
> >
> > BUG_ON(i != rec_argc);
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but can this BUG_ON() crash the tool on
> non-Intel x86 hosts or architectures without default events?
>
> If need_arch_event is true but the architecture hook returns early without
> adding events, rec_argc will be greater than the final value of i.
>
> For example, in tools/perf/util/kvm-stat-arch/kvm-stat-x86.c:
>
> __kvm_add_default_arch_event_x86() {
> if (!x86__is_intel_cpu())
> return 0;
> ...
> }
>
> On AMD hosts, this returns 0 without incrementing the argument count, leaving
> i less than rec_argc and triggering the BUG_ON() assertion.
>
> >
> > ret = cmd_record(i, rec_argv);
> >
> > EXIT:
> > - for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
> > - free((void *)rec_argv[j]);
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does removing this cleanup loop leak memory on PowerPC architectures?
>
> While the central code now uses stack variables, the PowerPC architecture
> hook still dynamically allocates its default events.
>
> In tools/perf/util/kvm-stat-arch/kvm-stat-powerpc.c:
>
> __kvm_add_default_arch_event_powerpc() {
> ...
> argv[j++] = strdup("-e");
> argv[j++] = strdup("trace_imc/trace_cycles/");
> ...
> }
>
> Since these strings are allocated with strdup() and the free() loops in
> __cmd_record(), __cmd_top(), and kvm_events_record() have been removed,
> will these strings leak during command execution?
Right, will update powerpc.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> > free(rec_argv);
> > return ret;
> > }
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623070313.55225-1-namhyung@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 7:03 [PATCH v1 0/4] perf kvm: A small update in default arch event Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf kvm: Factor out kvm_need_default_arch_event() Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 16:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf kvm: Check kvm_need_default_arch_event() early Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 16:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf kvm: Kill STRDUP_FAIL_EXIT() Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 16:50 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-06-23 7:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf test: Simplify perf kvm record/report tests Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 7:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 16:52 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajq5WwN07wH35012@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox