Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: TAKANO Mitsuhiro <takano32@gmail.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf vendor events arm64 AmpereOneX: Drop stale BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT entry
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 17:34:48 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auEK6E-jX12Bi8u_@phoenix2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021224527.167637-1-takano32@gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 10:45:27PM +0000, TAKANO Mitsuhiro wrote:
> AmpereOne carried BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT for EventCode 0x121 until it was
> renamed to GPC_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT in 10a149e4b4a9; that rename and the
> AmpereOneX table were patches 3 and 4 of the same series, so the new file
> kept the old name.
> 
> The result is a table that names the 0x121 counter twice:
> ampereonex/core-imp-def.json has GPC_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT, and
> ampereonex/memory.json adds BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT with the same code and
> the same description.  On AmpereOneX perf therefore lists two events for
> one counter, one of them under a name the documentation does not use.
> No metric and no other file refers to either name, so removing the stale
> entry cannot change a metric.
> 
> It also leaves memory.json holding only the ArchStdEvent aliases the
> other files of that kind carry: AmpereOne's memory.json has no raw
> EventCode at all, and neither has any other file of the AmpereOneX set
> except the ones where raw codes belong.
 
> Nothing catches this at build time.  jevents.py asserts on duplicate
> event names, but x86 repeats an EventCode for many events because the
> code carries umask and unit bits (3756 times across its tables) and
> powerpc repeats five codes, so a duplicate-code check is not possible.
> arm64 is the only architecture where no table but this one repeats a
> code.

Maybe a followup improvement to jevents.py?
 
> Not tested on hardware: there is no AmpereOneX machine here, so perf was
> not run against the real PMU.  The change only edits a JSON table; the
> perf build was verified and the generated table for this PMU goes from
> two names for 0x121 to one (rebuilt, counted in pmu-events.c).

Ilkka, can I have your Reviewed-by or Acked-by?

Thanks,

- Arnaldo
 
> Fixes: 16438b652b46 ("perf vendor events arm64 AmpereOneX: Add core PMU events and metrics")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: TAKANO Mitsuhiro <takano32@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json     | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json
> index 6c06bc928415..2a83782f51b0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json
> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json
> @@ -33,11 +33,5 @@
>      },
>      {
>          "ArchStdEvent": "MEM_ACCESS_CHECKED_WR"
> -    },
> -    {
> -        "PublicDescription": "Flushes due to memory hazards",
> -        "EventCode": "0x121",
> -        "EventName": "BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT",
> -        "BriefDescription": "Flushes due to memory hazards"
>      }
>  ]
> 
> base-commit: f47d223627f80cb7a1eb14c585fe6cb35de5e984
> -- 
> 2.53.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-27 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-21 22:45 [PATCH] perf vendor events arm64 AmpereOneX: Drop stale BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT entry TAKANO Mitsuhiro
2026-10-21 22:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 20:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2026-10-27 21:37   ` Ian Rogers
2026-10-29  1:09     ` Ilkka Koskinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auEK6E-jX12Bi8u_@phoenix2 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=takano32@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox