From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
sashiko-bot@kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] perf/cxl: Avoid cpumask_of(-1) when no CPU is assigned
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 17:11:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa12f874-c594-4cdb-94ea-4a53aad11c8f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729201446.62732044@jic23-huawei>
On 7/29/26 12:14 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2026 07:55:55 -0700
> Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> cpumask_show() feeds info->on_cpu straight into cpumask_of() for the
>> world-readable cpumask sysfs attribute. on_cpu is -1 before the first
>> hotplug online callback and transiently in cxl_pmu_offline_cpu() before a
>> new target is chosen. cpumask_of(-1) treats the CPU number as unsigned and
>> does out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic in get_cpu_mask(), so a concurrent
>> read of the attribute dereferences a wild pointer and can fault -- a local
>> denial of service.
>>
>
> I'm not keen on the solution here.
>
> The transient state is ugly anyway. We can just move setting it to -1 into
> the dummy code that deals with that well known case of you have CPUs online
> and code is still running.
>
> The init case looks like a false positive to me. But maybe I'm missing stuff.
> The perf registration that surfaces the sysfs happens after hotplug handler is
> added and I believe that synchronously runs it for CPUs that are already up.
> Given we are running code (and CXL stuff isn't super early) something will
> be up so it won't remain -1 by the time of use.
>
> Can we just use the generic stuff? Maybe need Robin's stuff to add init / exit
> per driver calls.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/cover.1784911757.git.robin.murphy@arm.com/
I'll drop this patch for now.
DJ
>
> In general, I'd like Robin to take a quick look at the more generic perf
> parts of this series given he has clearly been deep in this stuff a lot
> more recently than me :)
>
> Jonathan
>
>> Read on_cpu once and emit an empty mask when it is negative.
>>
>> Fixes: 5d7107c72796 ("perf: CXL Performance Monitoring Unit driver")
>> Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
>> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715191454.459673-1-dave@stgolabs.net?part=1
>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
>> index f42238b2b6b0..6aad381c0376 100644
>> --- a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
>> @@ -501,8 +501,17 @@ static ssize_t cpumask_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> char *buf)
>> {
>> struct cxl_pmu_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int cpu = READ_ONCE(info->on_cpu);
>>
>> - return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, cpumask_of(info->on_cpu));
>> + /*
>> + * on_cpu is -1 before the first online callback and transiently during
>> + * cxl_pmu_offline_cpu(). cpumask_of(-1) computes an out-of-bounds
>> + * pointer, so report an empty mask instead.
>> + */
>> + if (cpu < 0)
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "\n");
>> +
>> + return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, cpumask_of(cpu));
>> }
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(cpumask);
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 14:55 [PATCH v2 0/9] perf/cxlpmu: Misc sashiko raised issues fixes Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] perf/cxl: Program the requested event group on configurable counters Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 15:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 22:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-30 15:50 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] perf/cxl: Clear stale event fields before reprogramming a counter Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 22:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-30 15:45 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] perf/cxl: Fix the counter overflow delta fixup Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 22:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-30 16:56 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-30 17:19 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-30 19:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-29 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] perf/cxl: Accept an overflow interrupt on MSI message number 0 Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 19:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-29 19:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-07-30 12:18 ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-30 17:57 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-30 18:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-30 21:32 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] perf/cxl: Keep the overflow interrupt pinned to the managed CPU Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-29 20:27 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-07-30 11:46 ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-30 18:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-30 21:34 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-30 22:19 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] perf/cxl: Unfreeze counters after handling an overflow interrupt Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 19:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-30 12:04 ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-30 18:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-30 23:00 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] perf/cxl: Validate the hardware-reported counter width Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-29 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] perf/cxl: Don't use pmu.dev in IRQ and hotplug callbacks after unregister Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 15:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-30 11:38 ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-30 18:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-29 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] perf/cxl: Avoid cpumask_of(-1) when no CPU is assigned Dave Jiang
2026-07-29 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-30 9:36 ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-31 0:11 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa12f874-c594-4cdb-94ea-4a53aad11c8f@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox