From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH phy-next 08/13] phy: lynx-28g: make lynx_28g_pll_read_configuration() callable per PLL
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 17:46:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260528174616.AFEE91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528172404.733196-9-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Typo in the commit message claiming a change to `lynx_28g_lane_read_configuration()` instead of `lynx_28g_pll_read_configuration()`.
--
commit 8204acc04881cb85ce412b9cf76131f9c69904c5
Author: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
phy: lynx-28g: make lynx_28g_pll_read_configuration() callable per PLL
This commit modifies the lynx_28g_pll_read_configuration function so that
it processes a single PLL structure rather than iterating over all PLLs
internally. The loop iterating over the PLLs is moved to the call site in
lynx_28g_probe.
> There is no functional reason, but lynx_28g_lane_read_configuration() is
> called per lane and lynx_28g_pll_read_configuration() iterates over PLLs
> internally. So the API exported by the lynx_info structure would not be
> uniform. Change lynx_28g_lane_read_configuration() to also permit
> reading the PLL configuration individually, and move the for loop at the
> call site.
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but there appears to be a typo in the commit message.
It mentions changing lynx_28g_lane_read_configuration to permit reading
the PLL configuration individually, but the patch actually modifies
lynx_28g_pll_read_configuration.
Could the commit message be updated to reflect the correct function name?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260528172404.733196-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com?part=8
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 17:23 [PATCH phy-next 00/13] New Generic PHY driver for Lynx 10G SerDes Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:23 ` [PATCH phy-next 01/13] dt-bindings: phy: lynx-10g: initial document Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 17:45 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-29 12:50 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:23 ` [PATCH phy-next 02/13] phy: lynx-28g: move lane mode helpers to new core module Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:23 ` [PATCH phy-next 03/13] phy: lynx-28g: move data structures to core Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:23 ` [PATCH phy-next 04/13] phy: lynx-28g: common lynx_pll_get() Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:23 ` [PATCH phy-next 05/13] phy: lynx-28g: generalize protocol converter accessors Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:23 ` [PATCH phy-next 06/13] phy: lynx-28g: provide default lynx_lane_supports_mode() implementation Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:23 ` [PATCH phy-next 07/13] phy: lynx-28g: move struct lynx_info definitions downwards Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:23 ` [PATCH phy-next 08/13] phy: lynx-28g: make lynx_28g_pll_read_configuration() callable per PLL Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-28 17:24 ` [PATCH phy-next 09/13] phy: lynx-28g: common probe() and remove() Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 18:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 12:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:24 ` [PATCH phy-next 10/13] phy: lynx-28g: add support for big endian register maps Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 12:00 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:24 ` [PATCH phy-next 11/13] phy: lynx-28g: optimize read-modify-write operation Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:24 ` [PATCH phy-next 12/13] phy: lynx-10g: new driver Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 18:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 12:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-05-28 17:24 ` [PATCH phy-next 13/13] MAINTAINERS: expand Lynx 28G entry to cover Lynx 10G SerDes Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260528174616.AFEE91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox