From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wentao Liang" <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: sunplus: fix refcount leak in sp_uphy_init()
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:33:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616143321.0ED691F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616142234.1690457-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Kernel panic due to dereferencing an ERR_PTR if the optional nvmem cell fails to load.
- [High] Memory leak of the buffer returned by `nvmem_cell_read()`.
- [High] Unconditional out-of-bounds read on the nvmem buffer.
- [High] Imbalanced cleanup in error handling causing reference count underflows.
--
commit 98fd47236db60bb82bb9a431f603e28290ff2a8b
Author: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
phy: sunplus: fix refcount leak in sp_uphy_init()
This commit changes the error path in sp_uphy_init to correctly jump to
err_reset instead of returning directly when update_disc_vol fails,
ensuring resources are cleaned up.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 99d9ccd97385 ("phy: usb: Add USB2.0 phy driver for Sunplus SP7021")
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> index 637a5fbae6d9a..c7bc3ac89ca9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static int sp_uphy_init(struct phy *phy)
> /* disconnect voltage */
> ret = update_disc_vol(usbphy);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could this call lead to a kernel panic
if the optional nvmem cell fails to load?
In drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c:update_disc_vol(), the return
value of nvmem_cell_get is checked, but if it is an error pointer other
than -EPROBE_DEFER, it is passed directly to nvmem_cell_read:
drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c:update_disc_vol() {
cell = nvmem_cell_get(usbphy->dev, disc_name);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cell)) {
if (PTR_ERR(cell) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
}
otp_v = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);
...
}
Does this cause an invalid memory access when nvmem_cell_read attempts to
dereference the unhandled error pointer?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does update_disc_vol() leak the buffer
returned by nvmem_cell_read()?
otp_v = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);
nvmem_cell_put(cell);
if (!IS_ERR(otp_v)) {
set = *(otp_v + 1);
set = (set << (sizeof(char) * 8)) | *otp_v;
...
Is the dynamically allocated memory for otp_v leaked when the function
returns?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a potential out-of-bounds read
on the nvmem buffer here?
if (!IS_ERR(otp_v)) {
set = *(otp_v + 1);
...
Are we unconditionally accessing the second byte of the buffer without
verifying that the returned length in otp_l is at least 2 bytes?
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_reset;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but do the error paths in sp_uphy_init()
incorrectly clean up resources that failed to initialize?
If clk_prepare_enable fails, the code jumps to err_clk and calls
clk_disable_unprepare on the same clock:
drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c:sp_uphy_init() {
ret = clk_prepare_enable(usbphy->phy_clk);
if (ret)
goto err_clk;
ret = reset_control_deassert(usbphy->rstc);
if (ret)
goto err_reset;
...
err_reset:
reset_control_assert(usbphy->rstc);
err_clk:
clk_disable_unprepare(usbphy->phy_clk);
return ret;
}
Would this decrement the clock framework's reference counts for a clock
that was never successfully enabled? Similarly, if reset_control_deassert
fails, it asserts the reset that failed to deassert.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616142234.1690457-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 14:22 [PATCH] phy: sunplus: fix refcount leak in sp_uphy_init() Wentao Liang
2026-06-16 14:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616143321.0ED691F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox