* [PATCH] phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work
@ 2026-07-28 12:33 Hongyan Xu
2026-07-28 12:43 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hongyan Xu @ 2026-07-28 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vkoul, kishon; +Cc: Hongyan Xu, linux-phy, linux-kernel, jianhao.xu
ns2_drd_phy_probe() initializes wq_extcon. Both GPIO IRQs and the probe
tail can queue it. There is no remove hook, so the delayed work can run
after driver-managed resources are being released.
Add a managed cleanup action before requesting IRQs. Devres releases the
IRQs first, then cancels the delayed work while extcon, GPIO and MMIO
state is still valid.
This issue was found by a static analysis tool.
Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
---
drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c
index 36ad02c33..54929edb1 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c
@@ -264,6 +264,13 @@ static irqreturn_t gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+static void ns2_drd_phy_cancel_work(void *data)
+{
+ struct ns2_phy_driver *driver = data;
+
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&driver->wq_extcon);
+}
+
static const struct phy_ops ops = {
.init = ns2_drd_phy_init,
.power_on = ns2_drd_phy_poweron,
@@ -342,6 +349,10 @@ static int ns2_drd_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&driver->wq_extcon, extcon_work);
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ns2_drd_phy_cancel_work, driver);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
driver->id_irq = gpiod_to_irq(driver->id_gpiod);
if (driver->id_irq < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to get ID IRQ\n");
--
2.50.1.windows.1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work
2026-07-28 12:33 [PATCH] phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work Hongyan Xu
@ 2026-07-28 12:43 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-28 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hongyan Xu; +Cc: neil.armstrong, linux-phy, vkoul, olteanv
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing locking between asynchronous extcon workqueue and synchronous PHY operations, combined with incorrect state synchronization ordering.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work ---
commit 8d24b4b2087e1cdd492f1048968a0d890732e5dd
Author: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work
This patch adds a managed cleanup action to cancel the delayed work
wq_extcon before requesting IRQs. This ensures the work does not run
after driver-managed resources have been released.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c
> index 8473fa5745296..d0959668df793 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -342,6 +349,10 @@ static int ns2_drd_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&driver->wq_extcon, extcon_work);
>
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ns2_drd_phy_cancel_work, driver);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I have a question about how the
extcon_work delayed work interacts with synchronous PHY operations.
In extcon_work(), we call extcon_set_state_sync() before updating
driver->data->new_state and calling connect_change():
if (!id && vbus) { /* Host connected */
extcon_set_state_sync(driver->edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, true);
pr_debug("Host cable connected\n");
driver->data->new_state = EVT_HOST;
connect_change(driver);
Because extcon_set_state_sync() invokes consumer notifiers synchronously,
could a consumer immediately call PHY APIs like ns2_drd_phy_init() or
ns2_drd_phy_poweron() in response?
If so, those PHY APIs would read driver->data->new_state before it has
been updated by the workqueue.
Furthermore, since there appears to be no internal locking, wouldn't
concurrent calls to ns2_drd_phy_init() and connect_change() race when
performing read-modify-write operations on the PHY registers?
> driver->id_irq = gpiod_to_irq(driver->id_gpiod);
> if (driver->id_irq < 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to get ID IRQ\n");
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728123423.781-2-getshell@seu.edu.cn?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-28 12:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-28 12:33 [PATCH] phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work Hongyan Xu
2026-07-28 12:43 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox