[PATCH v2] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix broken USB on Exynos5422 (TYPEC dependency)

[PATCH v2] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix broken USB on Exynos5422 (TYPEC dependency)

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

Older Exynos designs, like Exynos5422, do not have USB Type-C and the
USB DRD PHY does not really depend on Type-C for these devices at all.
Incorrectly added optional dependency on CONFIG_TYPEC caused this driver
to be missing for exynos_defconfig and as result Exynos5422-based boards
like Hardkernel Odroid HC1 failed to probe USB.

However ARM64 boards should have CONFIG_TYPEC enabled and in proper
state (e.g. =y when PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD is =y) for proper USB support on
Google GS101 boards.

Add itermediate CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC symbol to skip TYPEC on
older boards, while still expressing optional dependency.

Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Closes: https://krzk.eu/#/builders/21/builds/6139
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3c0b77e6-357d-453e-8b63-4757c3231bde@samsung.com/
Fixes: 09dc674295a3 ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: subscribe to orientation notifier if required")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

---

Patch for issue in linux-next

Changes in v2:
1. Add PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC, so arm64 defconfig will have both
   symbols in-sync
---
 drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig              | 12 +++++++++++-
 drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c |  1 +
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
index 7fba571c0e2b..b20ac6b75993 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
@@ -77,12 +77,22 @@ config PHY_S5PV210_USB2
 	  particular SoC is compiled in the driver. In case of S5PV210 two phys
 	  are available - device and host.
 
+# None of ARM32 Samsung boards use Type-C, however newer ARM64 do and
+# PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD driver needs TYPEC to be in a matching state to avoid link
+# failures (see optional dependencies in kconfig-language.rst).  Intermediate
+# PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC symbol allows to skip TYPEC on ARM32 boards.
+config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC
+	tristate
+	depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
+	depends on ARM || TYPEC || !TYPEC
+	default y
+
 config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD
 	tristate "Exynos5 SoC series USB DRD PHY driver"
 	depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && OF) || COMPILE_TEST
 	depends on HAS_IOMEM
-	depends on TYPEC || (TYPEC=n && COMPILE_TEST)
 	depends on USB_DWC3_EXYNOS
+	depends on PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC
 	select GENERIC_PHY
 	select MFD_SYSCON
 	default y
diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
index ff2436f11d68..6d571dff2898 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
@@ -1456,6 +1456,7 @@ static int exynos5_usbdrd_setup_notifiers(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd)
 {
 	int ret;
 
+	/* See CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC */
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TYPEC))
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.43.0


-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

Re: [PATCH v2] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix broken USB on Exynos5422 (TYPEC dependency)

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/02/2025 12:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> +
>  config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD
>  	tristate "Exynos5 SoC series USB DRD PHY driver"
>  	depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && OF) || COMPILE_TEST
>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM
> -	depends on TYPEC || (TYPEC=n && COMPILE_TEST)
>  	depends on USB_DWC3_EXYNOS
> +	depends on PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC

This probably should be COMPILE_TEST to preserve previous compile
testing options on !ARCH_EXYNOS

Best regards,
Krzysztof

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

Re: [PATCH v2] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix broken USB on Exynos5422 (TYPEC dependency)

[André Draszik]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Sun, 2025-02-16 at 12:41 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Older Exynos designs, like Exynos5422, do not have USB Type-C and the
> USB DRD PHY does not really depend on Type-C for these devices at all.
> Incorrectly added optional dependency on CONFIG_TYPEC caused this driver
> to be missing for exynos_defconfig and as result Exynos5422-based boards
> like Hardkernel Odroid HC1 failed to probe USB.
> 
> However ARM64 boards should have CONFIG_TYPEC enabled and in proper
> state (e.g. =y when PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD is =y) for proper USB support on
> Google GS101 boards.
> 
> Add itermediate CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC symbol to skip TYPEC on
> older boards, while still expressing optional dependency.
> 
> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://krzk.eu/#/builders/21/builds/6139
> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3c0b77e6-357d-453e-8b63-4757c3231bde@samsung.com/
> Fixes: 09dc674295a3 ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: subscribe to orientation notifier if required")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Patch for issue in linux-next
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 1. Add PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC, so arm64 defconfig will have both
>    symbols in-sync
> ---
>  drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig              | 12 +++++++++++-
>  drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
> index 7fba571c0e2b..b20ac6b75993 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -77,12 +77,22 @@ config PHY_S5PV210_USB2
>  	  particular SoC is compiled in the driver. In case of S5PV210 two phys
>  	  are available - device and host.
>  
> +# None of ARM32 Samsung boards use Type-C, however newer ARM64 do and
> +# PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD driver needs TYPEC to be in a matching state to avoid link
> +# failures (see optional dependencies in kconfig-language.rst).  Intermediate
> +# PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC symbol allows to skip TYPEC on ARM32 boards.
> +config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC
> +	tristate
> +	depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> +	depends on ARM || TYPEC || !TYPEC
> +	default y
> +
>  config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD
>  	tristate "Exynos5 SoC series USB DRD PHY driver"
>  	depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && OF) || COMPILE_TEST
>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM
> -	depends on TYPEC || (TYPEC=n && COMPILE_TEST)

Is it not possible to just drop the '&& COMPILE_TEST' part to make
it
  depends on TYPEC || TYPEC=n
or
  depends on TYPEC || !TYPEC
(without any of the other changes)?

If not, why not, are there corner cases that doesn't catch? Some
minimal testing seems to suggest that that works, too.

Cheers,
Andre'

>  	depends on USB_DWC3_EXYNOS
> +	depends on PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC
>  	select GENERIC_PHY
>  	select MFD_SYSCON
>  	default y
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> index ff2436f11d68..6d571dff2898 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> @@ -1456,6 +1456,7 @@ static int exynos5_usbdrd_setup_notifiers(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	/* See CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC */
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TYPEC))
>  		return 0;
>  


-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

Re: [PATCH v2] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix broken USB on Exynos5422 (TYPEC dependency)

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/02/2025 06:59, André Draszik wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Sun, 2025-02-16 at 12:41 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Older Exynos designs, like Exynos5422, do not have USB Type-C and the
>> USB DRD PHY does not really depend on Type-C for these devices at all.
>> Incorrectly added optional dependency on CONFIG_TYPEC caused this driver
>> to be missing for exynos_defconfig and as result Exynos5422-based boards
>> like Hardkernel Odroid HC1 failed to probe USB.
>>
>> However ARM64 boards should have CONFIG_TYPEC enabled and in proper
>> state (e.g. =y when PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD is =y) for proper USB support on
>> Google GS101 boards.
>>
>> Add itermediate CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC symbol to skip TYPEC on
>> older boards, while still expressing optional dependency.
>>
>> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> Closes: https://krzk.eu/#/builders/21/builds/6139
>> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3c0b77e6-357d-453e-8b63-4757c3231bde@samsung.com/
>> Fixes: 09dc674295a3 ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: subscribe to orientation notifier if required")
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Patch for issue in linux-next
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> 1. Add PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC, so arm64 defconfig will have both
>>    symbols in-sync
>> ---
>>  drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig              | 12 +++++++++++-
>>  drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
>> index 7fba571c0e2b..b20ac6b75993 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
>> @@ -77,12 +77,22 @@ config PHY_S5PV210_USB2
>>  	  particular SoC is compiled in the driver. In case of S5PV210 two phys
>>  	  are available - device and host.
>>  
>> +# None of ARM32 Samsung boards use Type-C, however newer ARM64 do and
>> +# PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD driver needs TYPEC to be in a matching state to avoid link
>> +# failures (see optional dependencies in kconfig-language.rst).  Intermediate
>> +# PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC symbol allows to skip TYPEC on ARM32 boards.
>> +config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD_TYPEC
>> +	tristate
>> +	depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
>> +	depends on ARM || TYPEC || !TYPEC
>> +	default y
>> +
>>  config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD
>>  	tristate "Exynos5 SoC series USB DRD PHY driver"
>>  	depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && OF) || COMPILE_TEST
>>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM
>> -	depends on TYPEC || (TYPEC=n && COMPILE_TEST)
> 
> Is it not possible to just drop the '&& COMPILE_TEST' part to make
> it
>   depends on TYPEC || TYPEC=n
> or
>   depends on TYPEC || !TYPEC
> (without any of the other changes)?
> 
> If not, why not, are there corner cases that doesn't catch? Some
> minimal testing seems to suggest that that works, too.

Yeah, I think I overcomplicated it. I wanted to make it really
independent from TYPEC on ARM, but that's not trivial and my patch fails
here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy