Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add support for PCIe3 on x1e80100

From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	kishon@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org,
	konradybcio@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, abel.vesa@linaro.org,
	quic_msarkar@quicinc.com, quic_devipriy@quicinc.com,
	dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, kw@linux.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
	neil.armstrong@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, johan+linaro@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add support for PCIe3 on x1e80100
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:25:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abf5b78f-95d6-44e6-93f6-616178ad328d@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef37236d-8856-4981-82fa-c0194d7b3dfc@quicinc.com>

On 13.11.2024 4:15 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
> 
> On 11/13/2024 1:29 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 11:44:17AM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
>>> On 11/5/2024 1:28 PM, Qiang Yu wrote:
>>>> On 11/4/2024 10:35 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 08:09:02PM -0700, Qiang Yu wrote:
>>>>>> +            ranges = <0x01000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0x78200000 0x0
>>>>>> 0x100000>,
>>>>>> +                 <0x02000000 0x0 0x78300000 0x0 0x78300000 0x0
>>>>>> 0x3d00000>,
>>>>> Can you double check the size here so that it is indeed correct and not
>>>>> just copied from the other nodes which initially got it wrong:
>>>>>
>>>>>      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240710-topic-barman-v1-1-5f63fca8d0fc@linaro.org/
>>> BTW, regions of PCIe6a, PCIe4, PCIe5 are 64MB, 32MB, 32MB, respectively.
>>> Why range size is set to 0x1d00000 for PCIe6a, any issue is reported on
>>> PCIe6a?
>> Thanks for checking. It seems the patch linked to above was broken for
>> PCIe6a then.
>>
>> We did see PCIe5 probe breaking due to the overlap with PCIe4 but the
>> patch predates PCIe5 support being posted and merged so it was probably
>> just based on inspection.
>>
>> Could you send a fix for PCIe6a?
> Sure, will send the fix.

So the patch I posted made it match the DSDT/Windows state. I assumed
there must have been something wrong as docs suggested the value that you
did.

But both work. In case any issues pop up, we can revisit this.

Konrad

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy