public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: "'Len Brown'" <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: "'Srinivas Pandruvada'" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	"'Linux PM'" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: x86_energy_perf_policy
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:15:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000701d643f0$fa0f3140$ee2d93c0$@net> (raw)

Hi Len,

I have been using x86_energy_perf_policy to manage EPB while I do some tests.
I noticed it says this:

"HWP can be enabled using '--hwp-enable'"

So, I thought great, I can now in one boot do:

intel_pstate, no-HWP, performance/powersave.
intel_cpufreq, no-HWP, all governors

run: x86_energy_perf_policy --hwp-enable

then repeat the above, but only passive, if trying some of Rafael's RFC stuff,
which is NOT part of this e-mail.

However, enabling HWP via this method leaves my system in an unusable state.

Please confirm or deny if I am supposed to be able to enable HWP via
x86_energy_perf_policy?

No need to read on:

Examples (kernel 5.8=rc1):

Note: I wrote my own MSR decoder. I know I could use turbostat, and do
have it running virtually 100% of the time. However, writing my own
decoder forced me to learn more.

Fresh boot (no=hwp forced):

root@s18:/home/doug# /home/doug/c/msr-decoder
8.) 0x198: IA32_PERF_STATUS     : CPU 0-5 :   8 :   8 :   8 :   8 :   8 :   8 :
B.) 0x770: IA32_PM_ENABLE: 0 : HWP disable
9.) 0x199: IA32_PERF_CTL        : CPU 0-5 :   9 :   8 :   8 :   8 :  19 :  26 :
C.) 0x1B0: IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: CPU 0-5 :   6 :   6 :   6 :   6 :   6 :   6 :
1.) 0x19C: IA32_THERM_STATUS: 88480000
2.) 0x1AA: MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT: 401CC0 EIST enabled Coordination enabled OOB Bit 8 reset OOB Bit 18 reset
3.) 0x1B1: IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS: 88470000
4.) 0x64F: MSR_CORE_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS: 0
A.) 0x1FC: MSR_POWER_CTL: 3C005D : C1E disable : RHO disable : EEO disable

Now,

# x86_energy_perf_policy --hwp-enable

root@s18:/home/doug# /home/doug/c/msr-decoder
8.) 0x198: IA32_PERF_STATUS     : CPU 0-5 :   8 :   8 :   8 :   8 :   8 :   8 :
B.) 0x770: IA32_PM_ENABLE: 1 : HWP enable
1.) 0x19C: IA32_THERM_STATUS: 88480000
2.) 0x1AA: MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT: 401CC0 EIST enabled Coordination enabled OOB Bit 8 reset OOB Bit 18 reset
3.) 0x1B1: IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS: 88460000
4.) 0x64F: MSR_CORE_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS: 0
A.) 0x1FC: MSR_POWER_CTL: 3C005D : C1E disable : RHO disable : EEO disable
5.) 0x771: IA32_HWP_CAPABILITIES (performance): 108252E : high 46 : guaranteed 37 : efficient 8 : lowest 1
6.) 0x774: IA32_HWP_REQUEST:    CPU 0-5 :
    raw: 8000FF01 : 8000FF01 : 8000FF01 : 8000FF01 : 8000FF01 : 8000FF01 :
    min:        1 :        1 :        1 :        1 :        1 :        1 :
    max:      255 :      255 :      255 :      255 :      255 :      255 :
    des:        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :
    epp:      128 :      128 :      128 :      128 :      128 :      128 :
    act:        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :
7.) 0x777: IA32_HWP_STATUS: 0 : high 0 : guaranteed 0 : efficient 0 : lowest 0

Notice that EPP is 128, and I can not achieve full CPU speed for a workflow that should.
Ok. So maybe I just need to toggle between performance and powersave and back. No difference.
I tried many variations. There are many situations where the misbehaves.

If I boot with HWP enabled, I can observe EPP (and min and max) behave as expected
and as a function of the governor. The system seems to behave.

intel_pstate / powersave:

root@s18:/home/doug# /home/doug/c/msr-decoder
8.) 0x198: IA32_PERF_STATUS     : CPU 0-5 :   8 :   8 :   8 :   8 :   8 :   8 :
B.) 0x770: IA32_PM_ENABLE: 1 : HWP enable
1.) 0x19C: IA32_THERM_STATUS: 88480800 PWL
2.) 0x1AA: MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT: 401CC0 EIST enabled Coordination enabled OOB Bit 8 reset OOB Bit 18 reset
3.) 0x1B1: IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS: 88470800 PWL
4.) 0x64F: MSR_CORE_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS: 4000000 PL1L
A.) 0x1FC: MSR_POWER_CTL: 3C005D : C1E disable : RHO disable : EEO disable
5.) 0x771: IA32_HWP_CAPABILITIES (performance): 108252E : high 46 : guaranteed 37 : efficient 8 : lowest 1
6.) 0x774: IA32_HWP_REQUEST:    CPU 0-5 :
    raw: 80002E08 : 80002E08 : 80002E08 : 80002E08 : 80002E08 : 80002E08 :
    min:        8 :        8 :        8 :        8 :        8 :        8 :
    max:       46 :       46 :       46 :       46 :       46 :       46 :
    des:        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :
    epp:      128 :      128 :      128 :      128 :      128 :      128 :
    act:        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :
7.) 0x777: IA32_HWP_STATUS: 4 : high 4 : guaranteed 0 : efficient 0 : lowest 0

intel_pstate / performance:

root@s18:/home/doug# /home/doug/c/msr-decoder
8.) 0x198: IA32_PERF_STATUS     : CPU 0-5 :  46 :  46 :  46 :  46 :  46 :  46 :
B.) 0x770: IA32_PM_ENABLE: 1 : HWP enable
1.) 0x19C: IA32_THERM_STATUS: 88470800 PWL
2.) 0x1AA: MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT: 401CC0 EIST enabled Coordination enabled OOB Bit 8 reset OOB Bit 18 reset
3.) 0x1B1: IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS: 88460800 PWL
4.) 0x64F: MSR_CORE_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS: 4000000 PL1L
A.) 0x1FC: MSR_POWER_CTL: 3C005D : C1E disable : RHO disable : EEO disable
5.) 0x771: IA32_HWP_CAPABILITIES (performance): 108252E : high 46 : guaranteed 37 : efficient 8 : lowest 1
6.) 0x774: IA32_HWP_REQUEST:    CPU 0-5 :
    raw: 00002E2E : 00002E2E : 00002E2E : 00002E2E : 00002E2E : 00002E2E :
    min:       46 :       46 :       46 :       46 :       46 :       46 :
    max:       46 :       46 :       46 :       46 :       46 :       46 :
    des:        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :
    epp:        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :
    act:        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :        0 :
7.) 0x777: IA32_HWP_STATUS: 4 : high 4 : guaranteed 0 : efficient 0 : lowest 0

... Doug



             reply	other threads:[~2020-06-16 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16 15:15 Doug Smythies [this message]
2020-06-25 15:27 ` x86_energy_perf_policy Doug Smythies
2020-08-13 22:04   ` x86_energy_perf_policy Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000701d643f0$fa0f3140$ee2d93c0$@net' \
    --to=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox