Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Bail out early if !X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE
@ 2026-07-18 15:15 Rong Zhang
  2026-07-19 15:03 ` mhklkml
  2026-07-20  5:14 ` K Prateek Nayak
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rong Zhang @ 2026-07-18 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Huang Rui, Mario Limonciello, Perry Yuan, K Prateek Nayak,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Borislav Petkov, Jason Andryuk
  Cc: Michael Kelley, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Rong Zhang

When booting a VM that simulates or passes-through a relatively new CPU
model, these warning messages are printed to kmsg:

    amd_pstate: The CPPC feature is supported but currently disabled by the BIOS.
    Please enable it if your BIOS has the CPPC option.
    amd_pstate: the _CPC object is not present in SBIOS or ACPI disabled

Technically the check is not wrong and acts as a safetynet that prevents
the driver from being registered incorrectly, but the warning messages
are noisy and incorrect, as the CPPC feature is neither supported in a
VM nor disabled by the VM's BIOS.

The CPPC feature is disabled by the hypervisor as it makes no sense to
expose them to guests. It creates a paradox that the same kernel both
disables CPPC as a hypervisor (KVM) and warns about it being disabled
as a guest.

X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE indicates if the platform supports frequency
scaling or not. It is disabled on virtualized platforms (namely, KVM and
Hyper-V have been reported to do so) and is always set on physical
platforms that support frequency scaling.

Check for X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE as a prerequisite and bail out early if
it's unsupported.

Fixes: cb817ec6673b ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: show CPPC debug message if CPPC is not supported")
Signed-off-by: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>
---
Changes in v2:
- Check for X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE instead of X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR
  (thanks K Prateek Nayak)
- Remove the check against Xen dom0, as it doesn't need the amd-pstate
  driver (thanks Jason Andryuk)
- Reword comments and the commit message
- Remove Gautham R. Shenoy from the To list due to email bounces
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260716-amd-pstate-vm-v1-1-2ac97d3cf6e7@rong.moe
---
 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
index a74a4cf99d22..877b4b30ecd0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
@@ -2228,6 +2228,13 @@ static int __init amd_pstate_init(void)
 	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	/*
+	 * Do not continue on the following checks and emit bogus warning
+	 * messages if the platform doesn't support frequency scaling at all.
+	 */
+	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE))
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	/* show debug message only if CPPC is not supported */
 	if (!amd_cppc_supported())
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

---
base-commit: 94515f3a7d4256a5062176b7d6ed0471938cd51a
change-id: 1cc24037-amd-pstate-vm-d6ab4c959bd3

Thanks,
Rong


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Bail out early if !X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE
  2026-07-18 15:15 [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Bail out early if !X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE Rong Zhang
@ 2026-07-19 15:03 ` mhklkml
  2026-07-20  5:14 ` K Prateek Nayak
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mhklkml @ 2026-07-19 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Rong Zhang', 'Huang Rui',
	'Mario Limonciello', 'Perry Yuan',
	'K Prateek Nayak', 'Rafael J. Wysocki',
	'Viresh Kumar', 'Borislav Petkov',
	'Jason Andryuk'
  Cc: 'Michael Kelley', linux-pm, linux-kernel

From: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe> Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2026 8:16 AM
> 
> When booting a VM that simulates or passes-through a relatively new CPU
> model, these warning messages are printed to kmsg:
> 
>     amd_pstate: The CPPC feature is supported but currently disabled by the BIOS.
>     Please enable it if your BIOS has the CPPC option.
>     amd_pstate: the _CPC object is not present in SBIOS or ACPI disabled
> 
> Technically the check is not wrong and acts as a safetynet that prevents
> the driver from being registered incorrectly, but the warning messages
> are noisy and incorrect, as the CPPC feature is neither supported in a
> VM nor disabled by the VM's BIOS.
> 
> The CPPC feature is disabled by the hypervisor as it makes no sense to
> expose them to guests. It creates a paradox that the same kernel both
> disables CPPC as a hypervisor (KVM) and warns about it being disabled
> as a guest.
> 
> X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE indicates if the platform supports frequency
> scaling or not. It is disabled on virtualized platforms (namely, KVM and
> Hyper-V have been reported to do so) and is always set on physical
> platforms that support frequency scaling.
> 
> Check for X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE as a prerequisite and bail out early if
> it's unsupported.
> 
> Fixes: cb817ec6673b ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: show CPPC debug message if CPPC is not supported")
> Signed-off-by: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>

Built a kernel with this patch against linux-next20260717. Tested
on guests in the Azure public cloud, which are running on Hyper-V.
Tested where the underlying processor is a Zen2, and also on a
Zen4. The warning messages are gone as expected.

Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> 

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Check for X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE instead of X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR
>   (thanks K Prateek Nayak)
> - Remove the check against Xen dom0, as it doesn't need the amd-pstate
>   driver (thanks Jason Andryuk)
> - Reword comments and the commit message
> - Remove Gautham R. Shenoy from the To list due to email bounces
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260716-amd-pstate-vm-v1-1-
> 2ac97d3cf6e7@rong.moe
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index a74a4cf99d22..877b4b30ecd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -2228,6 +2228,13 @@ static int __init amd_pstate_init(void)
>  	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD)
>  		return -ENODEV;
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * Do not continue on the following checks and emit bogus warning
> +	 * messages if the platform doesn't support frequency scaling at all.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	/* show debug message only if CPPC is not supported */
>  	if (!amd_cppc_supported())
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 94515f3a7d4256a5062176b7d6ed0471938cd51a
> change-id: 1cc24037-amd-pstate-vm-d6ab4c959bd3
> 
> Thanks,
> Rong
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Bail out early if !X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE
  2026-07-18 15:15 [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Bail out early if !X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE Rong Zhang
  2026-07-19 15:03 ` mhklkml
@ 2026-07-20  5:14 ` K Prateek Nayak
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: K Prateek Nayak @ 2026-07-20  5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rong Zhang, Huang Rui, Mario Limonciello, Perry Yuan,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Borislav Petkov, Jason Andryuk
  Cc: Michael Kelley, linux-pm, linux-kernel

Hello Rong,

On 7/18/2026 8:45 PM, Rong Zhang wrote:
> When booting a VM that simulates or passes-through a relatively new CPU
> model, these warning messages are printed to kmsg:
> 
>     amd_pstate: The CPPC feature is supported but currently disabled by the BIOS.
>     Please enable it if your BIOS has the CPPC option.

This is message is printed from amd_cppc_supported() ... 

>     amd_pstate: the _CPC object is not present in SBIOS or ACPI disabled
> 

[..snip..]

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index a74a4cf99d22..877b4b30ecd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -2228,6 +2228,13 @@ static int __init amd_pstate_init(void)
>  	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Do not continue on the following checks and emit bogus warning
> +	 * messages if the platform doesn't support frequency scaling at all.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE))
> +		return -ENODEV;

... so why add this check in amd_pstate_init()?

I personally prefer having the check in amd_cppc_supported() and
returning false from there with a pr_debug_once() saying processor does
not support frequency scaling.

> +
>  	/* show debug message only if CPPC is not supported */
>  	if (!amd_cppc_supported())
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 94515f3a7d4256a5062176b7d6ed0471938cd51a
> change-id: 1cc24037-amd-pstate-vm-d6ab4c959bd3
> 
> Thanks,
> Rong
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-20  5:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-18 15:15 [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Bail out early if !X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 15:03 ` mhklkml
2026-07-20  5:14 ` K Prateek Nayak

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox