From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain: rockchip: Relax SMCCC dependency
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 12:57:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e7cb553-be71-4403-bc25-64457ec3e3d4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpTaRZqdpwFnC5DgLjJAf1YawJ1L5OVgwfjnfs7iNyUhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2025-05-21 12:41 pm, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 20:38, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>>
>> Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2025, 19:10:17 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Robin Murphy:
>>> Most 32-bit Rockchip platforms do not use PSCI, so having to select
>>> ARM_PSCI to satisfy a dependency chain to retain working power domain
>>> support is a bit weird and non-obvious. Now that the offending SMCCC API
>>> is properly stubbed out for optional usage, we can relax this again.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>
>> Of course this needs patch1 of this series to get applied
>> first.
>>
>> I think for bisectability, doing this directly in patch1 might
>> be less dangerous though?
>>
>
> If it helps, I can pick both patches via my pmdomain tree, to make
> sure patch1 really gets applied prior to patch2.
Perhaps I should have been less lazy and written a brief cover letter,
but indeed, given the dependency my hope was for these to both go
together through the same tree - it's just an open question of which
tree that should be :)
Cheers,
Robin.
> Mark, Sudeep, Lorenzo do you see any problems with this?
>
> [...]
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 17:10 [PATCH 1/2] firmware: smccc: Stub out get_conduit() Robin Murphy
2025-05-20 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain: rockchip: Relax SMCCC dependency Robin Murphy
2025-05-20 18:38 ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-21 11:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-05-21 11:57 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2025-05-21 5:07 ` Urja
2025-05-20 18:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: smccc: Stub out get_conduit() Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-21 11:28 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e7cb553-be71-4403-bc25-64457ec3e3d4@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox