From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] ARM: mvebu: Add CPU idle support for Armada 38x
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:07:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140630170741.73256ba0@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403875377-940-16-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Gregory,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:22:56 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Unlike the Armada XP and the Armada 370, this SoC uses a Cortex A9
> core.
Isn't there some more details missing in this sentence? When I read it,
at the end of the sentence, I'm wondering "and so what? what does this
implies in terms of cpuidle support?".
> Beside this, the main difference for the cpu idle is the way to
> handle the L2 cache and the use of SCU.
Beside -> Besides.
of SCU -> of the SCU
> +static void __iomem *scu_base;
It's really a shame that the SCU driver isn't a driver on its own,
capable of storing the base address of the SCU instead of having to
pass it around everywhere. But for sure it's not the point of this
patch series to improve this as well.
> static struct platform_device mvebu_v7_cpuidle_device = {
> @@ -151,6 +168,7 @@ static int __init mvebu_v7_pmsu_init(void)
> np->full_name)) {
> pr_err("unable to request region\n");
> ret = -EBUSY;
> +
This change.
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -163,7 +181,6 @@ static int __init mvebu_v7_pmsu_init(void)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> }
> -
And this one look like spurious changes not related to the patch.
> out:
> of_node_put(np);
> return ret;
> @@ -260,6 +277,27 @@ static int armada_xp_370_cpu_suspend(unsigned long deepidle)
> return cpu_suspend(deepidle, do_armada_xp_370_cpu_suspend);
> }
>
> +static noinline int do_armada_38x_cpu_suspend(unsigned long deepidle)
> +{
> + mvebu_v7_pmsu_idle_prepare(deepidle, false);
> + /*
> + * Already flushed cache, but do it again as the outer cache
> + * functions dirty the cache with spinlocks
> + */
> + v7_exit_coherency_flush(louis);
> +
> + scu_power_mode(scu_base, SCU_PM_POWEROFF);
> +
> + cpu_do_idle();
I see cpu_do_idle() does dsb() and wfi(), so why don't we use in the
do_armada_370_xp_cpu_suspend() function ?
> +
> + return 1;
You return 1 here, but in the do_armada_370_xp_cpu_suspend() function
you return zero. Is the return value being used? Why use 0 in one case
and 1 in the other?
> +}
> +
> +static int armada_38x_cpu_suspend(unsigned long deepidle)
> +{
> + return cpu_suspend(false, do_armada_38x_cpu_suspend);
> +}
> +
> /* No locking is needed because we only access per-CPU registers */
> static noinline void mvebu_v7_pmsu_idle_restore(void)
> {
> @@ -268,7 +306,6 @@ static noinline void mvebu_v7_pmsu_idle_restore(void)
>
> if (pmsu_mp_base == NULL)
> return;
> -
Spurious change.
> /* cancel ask HW to power down the L2 Cache if possible */
> reg = readl(pmsu_mp_base + PMSU_CONTROL_AND_CONFIG(hw_cpu));
> reg &= ~PMSU_CONTROL_AND_CONFIG_L2_PWDDN;
> @@ -320,6 +357,23 @@ static struct mvebu_v7_cpuidle armada_370_cpuidle = {
> .mvebu_v7_cpu_suspend = armada_xp_370_cpu_suspend,
> };
>
> +static struct mvebu_v7_cpuidle armada_38x_cpuidle = {
> + .mvebu_v7_idle_driver = {
> + .name = "armada_38x_idle",
> + .states[0] = ARM_CPUIDLE_WFI_STATE,
> + .states[1] = {
> + .exit_latency = 10,
> + .power_usage = 5,
> + .target_residency = 100,
> + .flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
> + .name = "Idle",
> + .desc = "CPU and SCU power down",
> + },
> + .state_count = 2,
> + },
> + .mvebu_v7_cpu_suspend = armada_38x_cpu_suspend,
> +};
Should go to the cpuidle driver, IMO.
> static struct mvebu_v7_cpuidle armada_xp_cpuidle = {
> .mvebu_v7_idle_driver = {
> .name = "armada_xp_idle",
> @@ -371,6 +425,46 @@ static __init bool armada_370_cpuidle_init(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static __init bool armada_38x_cpuidle_init(void)
As mentioned earlier, this function should return an 'int'.
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + void __iomem *mpsoc_base;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
> + "marvell,armada-380-coherency-fabric");
> + if (!np)
> + return false;
return -ENODEV;
> + of_node_put(np);
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
> + "marvell,armada-380-mpcore-soc-ctrl");
> + if (!np)
> + return false;
return -ENODEV;
> + mpsoc_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + WARN_ON(!mpsoc_base);
WARN_ON() seems a bit weak for something that will make the next line
crash the kernel. What about:
if (!mpsoc_base)
return -ENOMEM;
I think the of_node_put(np) should be here.
> +
> + /* Set up reset mask when powering down the cpus */
> + reg = readl(mpsoc_base + MPCORE_RESET_CTL);
> + reg |= MPCORE_RESET_CTL_L2;
> + reg |= MPCORE_RESET_CTL_DEBUG;
> + writel(reg, mpsoc_base + MPCORE_RESET_CTL);
> + iounmap(mpsoc_base);
> + of_node_put(np);
> +
> + /* Set up delay */
> + reg = readl(pmsu_mp_base + PMSU_POWERDOWN_DELAY);
> + reg &= ~PMSU_POWERDOWN_DELAY_MASK;
> + reg |= PMSU_DFLT_ARMADA38X_DELAY;
> + reg |= PMSU_POWERDOWN_DELAY_PMU;
> + writel(reg, pmsu_mp_base + PMSU_POWERDOWN_DELAY);
> +
> + scu_base = mvebu_get_scu_base();
> + mvebu_cpu_resume = armada_38x_cpu_resume;
> + mvebu_v7_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = &armada_38x_cpuidle;
> + return true;
return 0;
> +}
> +
> static __init bool armada_xp_cpuidle_init(void)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> @@ -391,6 +485,9 @@ static struct of_device_id of_cpuidle_table[] __initdata = {
> { .compatible = "marvell,armada370",
> .data = (void *)armada_370_cpuidle_init,
> },
> + { .compatible = "marvell,armada380",
> + .data = (void *)armada_38x_cpuidle_init,
> + },
As mentioned in the comments to a previous commit, I'm not sure using a
match table is the best idea here.
> { /* end of list */ },
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu_ll.S b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu_ll.S
> index 3b702a16bd3d..15b823dff61a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu_ll.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu_ll.S
> @@ -23,6 +23,20 @@ ARM_BE8(setend be ) @ go BE8 if entered LE
> b cpu_resume
> ENDPROC(armada_370_xp_cpu_resume)
>
> +ENTRY(armada_38x_cpu_resume)
> + /* do we need it for Armada 38x*/
> +ARM_BE8(setend be ) @ go BE8 if entered LE
Yes, I believe we will need it. I'll try to do some testing and report.
> + bl v7_invalidate_l1
> + mrc p15, 4, r1, c15, c0 @ get SCU base address
> + orr r1, r1, #0x8 @ SCU CPU Power Status Register
> + mrc 15, 0, r0, cr0, cr0, 5 @ get the CPU ID
> + and r0, r0, #15
> + add r1, r1, r0
> + mov r0, #0x0
> + strb r0, [r1] @ switch SCU power state to Normal mode
> + b cpu_resume
> +ENDPROC(armada_38x_cpu_resume)
> +
> .global mvebu_boot_wa_start
> .global mvebu_boot_wa_end
>
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-30 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-27 13:22 [PATCH 00/16] CPU Idle for Armada 370 and Armada 38x Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 01/16] ARM: mvebu: Sort the headers of pmsu.c in alphabetic order Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 12:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-02 22:57 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 02/16] ARM: mvebu: Add a common function for the boot address work around Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 12:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-02 22:58 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-07-03 7:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-01 14:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-02 22:58 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 03/16] ARM: mvebu: Add function to export the physical address of the boot register Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 14:14 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 12:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 8:39 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-07-03 9:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 10:07 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-07-01 11:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-01 15:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 04/16] ARM: mvebu: Use the common function for Armada 375 SMP workaround Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 05/16] ARM: mvebu: Add workaround for cpuidle support for Armada 370 Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 12:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 8:44 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 06/16] ARM: mvebu: Rename the armada_370_xp into mvebu_v7 in pmsu.c file Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 12:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 8:47 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 07/16] ARM: mvebu: Make the CPU idle initialization more generic Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 14:15 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-28 14:56 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-30 10:30 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 14:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 8:54 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 08/16] ARM: mvebu: Use a local variable to store the resume address Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 15:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 9:24 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 09/16] ARM: mvebu: Make the snoop disable optional in mvebu_v7_pmsu_idle_prepare Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 15:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 12:50 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-07-03 12:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 10/16] ARM: mvebu: Export the SCU address Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 11/16] ARM: mvebu: dts: Add CA9 MPcore SoC Controller node Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 15:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 12:51 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 12/16] cpuidle: mvebu: Rename the driver from armada-370-xp to mvebu-v7 Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 13:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 13:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 13/16] cpuidle: mvebu: Move the description of the cpuidle states in the platform part Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 13:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 13:23 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 14/16] ARM: mvebu: Add CPU idle support for Armada 370 Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 13:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 15:03 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 15/16] ARM: mvebu: Add CPU idle support for Armada 38x Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 15:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-07-03 15:29 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-07-01 14:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-03 15:09 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 16/16] ARM: mvebu: defconfig: Enable CPU Idle support in mvebu_v7_defconfig Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-30 15:45 ` [PATCH 00/16] CPU Idle for Armada 370 and Armada 38x Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-30 15:51 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-07-01 14:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140630170741.73256ba0@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox