From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: acpi_cpufreq: base frequency attribute support
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 08:08:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160302023822.GM16437@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456855841.21069.59.camel@linux.intel.com>
On 01-03-16, 10:10, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > What about:
> >
> > acpi_cpufreq_attr[ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_cpu
> > freq_attr) - 2] = &base_frequency;
> >
> > and a comment to describe that ?
> >
> Will it work in this case?
> "
> Even if CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB is defined,
> acpi_cpufreq_attr[2] will be set to NULL in the init callback when
> some condition fails. So we will have a NULL in the acpi_cpufreq_attr[]
> before &base_frequency if we add at fixed place.
> "
Oh dude, you already have this hack in place in a different way. Though its
doable this way:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 51eef87bbc37..26c026a34e1e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ static void acpi_cpufreq_boost_exit(void)
static int __init acpi_cpufreq_init(void)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret, cpb_removed = 0;
if (acpi_disabled)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -967,6 +967,7 @@ static int __init acpi_cpufreq_init(void)
for (attr = acpi_cpufreq_attr; *attr; attr++)
if (*attr == &cpb) {
*attr = NULL;
+ cpb_removed = 1;
break;
}
}
And then the above statement:
acpi_cpufreq_attr[ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_cpufreq_attr) - 2 - cpb_removed] = &base_frequency;
But I would rather add another patch first to set the CPB thing in the array to
NULL and remove the ifdef from within the array. And then set it to a valid
attribute only if we are making an addition. And then you can easily keep a
count of the next NULL entry you can update.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-29 20:36 [PATCH] cpufreq: acpi_cpufreq: base frequency attribute support Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-03-01 2:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-03-01 18:10 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-03-02 2:38 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-01 22:25 Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-10-07 17:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-09 15:34 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-10-15 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-16 5:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-24 20:00 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-02-24 20:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-24 23:37 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-02-25 3:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-25 18:07 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-02-26 1:10 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2016-02-26 1:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-26 20:21 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-02-29 3:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-29 17:11 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-03-01 2:16 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160302023822.GM16437@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox