From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Performance levels of power domains
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:53:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161027102329.GF10423@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jPeauJGpQfr1VjDo1Z-Xd6UT4_4QLeso_CSEtB4zyaag@mail.gmail.com>
On 27-10-16, 12:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On the Intel side we also have a mechanism to tell the processor about
> the power/performance preference and it would be good to have a common
> way to do it on all platforms and genpd doesn't look like a
> particularly good place for that.
>
> Let's talk about this at the LPC.
Thanks for your feedback Rafael.
As I wouldn't be attending the LPC (though would try to get some
information from the guys who are going to attend it), will it be
possible for you to summarize why you think genpd is not the right
choice here?
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-27 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 10:52 [Discussion] Performance levels of power domains Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26 11:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-10-26 11:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26 11:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-10-28 0:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-28 8:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-10-26 19:00 ` Kevin Hilman
2016-10-27 3:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-27 7:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-27 8:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-27 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-27 7:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-27 10:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-27 10:23 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-10-27 10:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-27 11:46 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-10-28 4:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-27 13:12 ` Sudeep K N
2016-10-27 17:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2016-11-09 11:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10 19:14 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161027102329.GF10423@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox