From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Performance levels of power domains
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:21:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c11971ea-59aa-690a-95a3-d645ebb0074a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161026111642.GM9162@vireshk-i7>
On 26/10/16 12:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26-10-16, 12:09, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
>> I am mainly interested as there are efforts to standardize these
>> communication with M3 and there's WIP protocol development[1]. It would
>> be good to see if this user-case is also considered.
>
> What do you mean by that ?
Basically I wanted to know more details so that such system are also
considered(I agree it may not have any impact on the protocol at all,
but still good to consider them) when designing this new SCMI protocol.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 10:52 [Discussion] Performance levels of power domains Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26 11:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-10-26 11:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26 11:21 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2016-10-28 0:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-28 8:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-10-26 19:00 ` Kevin Hilman
2016-10-27 3:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-27 7:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-27 8:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-27 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-27 7:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-27 10:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-27 10:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-27 10:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-27 11:46 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-10-28 4:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-27 13:12 ` Sudeep K N
2016-10-27 17:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2016-11-09 11:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10 19:14 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c11971ea-59aa-690a-95a3-d645ebb0074a@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox