public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: gnurou@gmail.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, edubezval@gmail.com,
	dvhart@infradead.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, andy@infradead.org,
	hdegoede@redhat.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	sathyaosid@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: use chained irqs for second level irq chips
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:53:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170412115354.jkyzy26kv7pobtn2@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a0d428dbf05596a5e553ed0f06567b64c77c9c8.1491848776.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote:

> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Whishkey cove PMIC has support to mask/unmask interrupts at two levels.
> At first level we can mask/unmask interrupt domains like TMU, GPIO, ADC,
> CHGR, BCU THERMAL and PWRBTN and at second level, it provides facility
> to mask/unmask individual interrupts belong each of this domain. For
> example, in case of TMU, at first level we have TMU interrupt domain,
> and at second level we have two interrupts, wake alarm, system alarm that
> belong to the TMU interrupt domain.
> 
> Currently, in this driver all first level irqs are registered as part of
> irq chip(bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip). By default, after you register the irq
> chip from your driver, all irqs in that chip will masked and can only be
> enabled if that irq is requested using request_irq call. This is the
> default Linux irq behavior model. And whenever a dependent device that
> belongs to PMIC requests only the second level irq and not explicitly
> unmask the first level irq, then in essence the second level irq will
> still be disabled. For example, if TMU device driver request wake_alarm
> irq and not explicitly unmask TMU level 1 irq then according to the default
> Linux irq model,  wake_alarm irq will still be disabled. So the proper
> solution to fix this issue is to use the chained irq chip concept. We
> should chain all the second level chip irqs to the corresponding first
> level irq. To do this, we need to create separate irq chips for every
> group of second level irqs.
> 
> In case of TMU, when adding second level irq chip, instead of using pmic
> irq we should use the corresponding first level irq. So the following
> code will change from
> 
> ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, pmic->irq, ...)
> 
> to,
> 
> virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(&pmic->irq_chip_data, BXTWC_TMU_LVL1_IRQ);
> 
> ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, virq, ...)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h |   5 +
>  2 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
> index dc8af1d..807eba3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
> @@ -81,18 +81,26 @@ enum bxtwc_irqs {
>  	BXTWC_PWRBTN_IRQ,
>  };
>  
> -enum bxtwc_irqs_level2 {
> -	/* Level 2 */
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_tmu {
> +	BXTWC_TMU_IRQ = 0,
> +};
> +
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_bcu {
>  	BXTWC_BCU_IRQ = 0,
> -	BXTWC_ADC_IRQ,
> -	BXTWC_USBC_IRQ,
> +};
> +
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_adc {
> +	BXTWC_ADC_IRQ = 0,
> +};
> +
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_chgr {
> +	BXTWC_USBC_IRQ = 0,
>  	BXTWC_CHGR0_IRQ,
>  	BXTWC_CHGR1_IRQ,
> -	BXTWC_CRIT_IRQ,
>  };
>  
> -enum bxtwc_irqs_tmu {
> -	BXTWC_TMU_IRQ = 0,
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_crit {
> +	BXTWC_CRIT_IRQ = 0,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs[] = {
> @@ -107,17 +115,26 @@ static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs[] = {
>  	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_PWRBTN_IRQ, 1, 0x03),
>  };
>  
> -static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_level2[] = {
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_tmu[] = {
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_TMU_IRQ, 0, 0x06),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_bcu[] = {
>  	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_BCU_IRQ, 0, 0x1f),
> -	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_ADC_IRQ, 1, 0xff),
> -	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_USBC_IRQ, 2, BIT(5)),
> -	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CHGR0_IRQ, 2, 0x1f),
> -	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CHGR1_IRQ, 3, 0x1f),
> -	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CRIT_IRQ, 6, 0x03),
>  };
>  
> -static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_tmu[] = {
> -	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_TMU_IRQ, 0, 0x06),
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_adc[] = {
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_ADC_IRQ, 0, 0xff),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_chgr[] = {
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_USBC_IRQ, 0, BIT(5)),
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CHGR0_IRQ, 0, 0x1f),
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CHGR1_IRQ, 1, 0x1f),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_crit[] = {
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CRIT_IRQ, 0, 0x03),
>  };
>  
>  static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip = {
> @@ -129,15 +146,6 @@ static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip = {
>  	.num_regs = 2,
>  };
>  
> -static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_level2 = {
> -	.name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_level2",
> -	.status_base = BXTWC_BCUIRQ,
> -	.mask_base = BXTWC_MBCUIRQ,
> -	.irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_level2,
> -	.num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_level2),
> -	.num_regs = 10,
> -};
> -
>  static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_tmu = {
>  	.name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_tmu",
>  	.status_base = BXTWC_TMUIRQ,
> @@ -147,6 +155,42 @@ static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_tmu = {
>  	.num_regs = 1,
>  };
>  
> +static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_bcu = {
> +	.name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_bcu",
> +	.status_base = BXTWC_BCUIRQ,
> +	.mask_base = BXTWC_MBCUIRQ,
> +	.irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_bcu,
> +	.num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_bcu),
> +	.num_regs = 1,
> +};
> +
> +static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_adc = {
> +	.name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_adc",
> +	.status_base = BXTWC_ADCIRQ,
> +	.mask_base = BXTWC_MADCIRQ,
> +	.irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_adc,
> +	.num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_adc),
> +	.num_regs = 1,
> +};
> +
> +static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_chgr = {
> +	.name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_chgr",
> +	.status_base = BXTWC_CHGR0IRQ,
> +	.mask_base = BXTWC_MCHGR0IRQ,
> +	.irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_chgr,
> +	.num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_chgr),
> +	.num_regs = 2,
> +};
> +
> +static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_crit = {
> +	.name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_crit",
> +	.status_base = BXTWC_CRITIRQ,
> +	.mask_base = BXTWC_MCRITIRQ,
> +	.irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_crit,
> +	.num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_crit),
> +	.num_regs = 1,
> +};
> +
>  static struct resource gpio_resources[] = {
>  	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(BXTWC_GPIO_LVL1_IRQ, "GPIO"),
>  };
> @@ -358,6 +402,34 @@ static const struct regmap_config bxtwc_regmap_config = {
>  	.reg_read = regmap_ipc_byte_reg_read,
>  };
>  
> +static int bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(struct intel_soc_pmic *pmic,
> +				struct regmap_irq_chip_data *pdata,

> +				int pirq,
> +				int irq_flags,

Nit: These do not need to be on separate lines.

> +				const struct regmap_irq_chip *chip,
> +				struct regmap_irq_chip_data **data,
> +				int *irq)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_irq_get_virq(pdata, pirq);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(pmic->dev, "failed to get virtual interrupt=%d\n", ret);

s/=/: /

> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	*irq = ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, *irq, irq_flags, 0,
> +				  chip, data);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(pmic->dev, "Failed to add %s irq chip\n", chip->name);

s/irq/IRQ/

> +		return -ENODEV;

Why aren't you returning ret?

In fact, remove this line and ...

> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;

... return ret;

> +}
> +
>  static int bxtwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -409,22 +481,71 @@ static int bxtwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, pmic->irq,
> -				  IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
> -				  0, &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_level2,
> -				  &pmic->irq_chip_data_level2);
> +	ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> +					 BXTWC_TMU_LVL1_IRQ,
> +					 IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +					 &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_tmu,
> +					 &pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu,
> +					 &pmic->tmu_irq);

Isn't there a generic API for chained IRQs already?

>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add secondary IRQ chip\n");
> -		goto err_irq_chip_level2;
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add TMU IRQ chip\n");
> +		goto err_irq_chip_tmu;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, pmic->irq,
> -				  IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
> -				  0, &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_tmu,
> -				  &pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
> +	/* add chained irq handler for BCU irqs */

Use proper grammar.

"Add chained IRQ handler for BCU IRQs"

> +	ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> +					 BXTWC_BCU_LVL1_IRQ,
> +					 IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +					 &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_bcu,
> +					 &pmic->irq_chip_data_bcu,
> +					 &pmic->bcu_irq);
> +
> +
>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add TMU IRQ chip\n");
> -		goto err_irq_chip_tmu;
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add BUC IRQ chip\n");
> +		goto err_irq_chip_bcu;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* add chained irq handler for ADC irqs */

Grammar.

> +	ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> +					 BXTWC_ADC_LVL1_IRQ,
> +					 IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +					 &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_adc,
> +					 &pmic->irq_chip_data_adc,
> +					 &pmic->adc_irq);
> +
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add ADC IRQ chip\n");
> +		goto err_irq_chip_adc;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* add chained irq handler for CHGR irqs */
> +	ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> +					 BXTWC_CHGR_LVL1_IRQ,
> +					 IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +					 &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_chgr,
> +					 &pmic->irq_chip_data_chgr,
> +					 &pmic->chgr_irq);
> +
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add CHGR IRQ chip\n");
> +		goto err_irq_chip_chgr;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* add chained irq handler for CRIT irqs */
> +	ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> +					 BXTWC_CRIT_LVL1_IRQ,
> +					 IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +					 &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_crit,
> +					 &pmic->irq_chip_data_crit,
> +					 &pmic->crit_irq);
> +
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add CRIT irq chip\n");

s/irq/IRQ/

> +		goto err_irq_chip_crit;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, bxt_wc_dev,
> @@ -456,10 +577,16 @@ static int bxtwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  err_sysfs:
>  	mfd_remove_devices(&pdev->dev);
>  err_mfd:
> -	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->crit_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_crit);
> +err_irq_chip_crit:
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->chgr_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_chgr);
> +err_irq_chip_chgr:
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->adc_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_adc);
> +err_irq_chip_adc:
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->bcu_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_bcu);
> +err_irq_chip_bcu:
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->tmu_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
>  err_irq_chip_tmu:
> -	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_level2);
> -err_irq_chip_level2:
>  	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data);
>  
>  	return ret;
> @@ -472,8 +599,11 @@ static int bxtwc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &bxtwc_group);
>  	mfd_remove_devices(&pdev->dev);
>  	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data);
> -	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_level2);
> -	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->tmu_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->bcu_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_bcu);
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->adc_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_adc);
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->chgr_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_chgr);
> +	regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->crit_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_crit);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h b/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
> index 956caa0..63e1270 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
> @@ -23,10 +23,15 @@
>  
>  struct intel_soc_pmic {
>  	int irq;
> +	int tmu_irq, bcu_irq, adc_irq, chgr_irq, crit_irq;

Each attribute should be on a line of their own.

>  	struct regmap *regmap;
>  	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data;
>  	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_level2;
>  	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_tmu;
> +	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_bcu;
> +	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_adc;
> +	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_chgr;
> +	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_crit;
>  	struct device *dev;
>  };
>  

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-12 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-10 18:52 [PATCH v1 1/7] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: fix TMU interrupt index sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-10 18:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: remove thermal second level irqs sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-12 11:45   ` Lee Jones
2017-04-10 18:52 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] thermal: intel_bxt_pmic_thermal: use first level PMIC thermal irq sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-10 18:52 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: remove second level irq for gpio device sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-12 11:46   ` Lee Jones
2017-04-10 18:52 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] gpio: gpio-wcove: use first level PMIC GPIO irq sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-10 18:52 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: use chained irqs for second level irq chips sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-12 11:53   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2017-04-13 21:45     ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-04-10 18:52 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-04-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: fix TMU interrupt index Lee Jones
2017-04-12 17:59   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
2017-04-12 20:59     ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170412115354.jkyzy26kv7pobtn2@dell \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sathyaosid@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox