Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it,
	claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
	bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
	tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com, andresoportus@google.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	patrick.bellasi@arm.com, juri.lelli@arm.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 09:53:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170523085351.18586-6-juri.lelli@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170523085351.18586-1-juri.lelli@arm.com>

No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get
triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which
don't trigger them so frequently.

Remove such assumption from the code, by always considering
SCHED_DEADLINE utilization signal as not stale.

Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
---
Changes from RFD
 - discard CFS contribution only as stale (as suggested by Rafael)
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index f930cec4c3d4..688bd11c2641 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -259,17 +259,22 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 		s64 delta_ns;
 
 		/*
-		 * If the CPU utilization was last updated before the previous
-		 * frequency update and the time elapsed between the last update
-		 * of the CPU utilization and the last frequency update is long
-		 * enough, don't take the CPU into account as it probably is
-		 * idle now (and clear iowait_boost for it).
+		 * If the CFS CPU utilization was last updated before the
+		 * previous frequency update and the time elapsed between the
+		 * last update of the CPU utilization and the last frequency
+		 * update is long enough, reset iowait_boost and util_cfs, as
+		 * they are now probably stale. However, still consider the
+		 * CPU contribution if it has some DEADLINE utilization
+		 * (util_dl).
 		 */
 		delta_ns = time - j_sg_cpu->last_update;
 		if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
 			j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
-			continue;
+			j_sg_cpu->util_cfs = 0;
+			if (j_sg_cpu->util_dl == 0)
+				continue;
 		}
+
 		if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT)
 			return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
 
-- 
2.11.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-23  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-23  8:53 [PATCH RFC 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make use of DEADLINE utilization signal Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection triggering points Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make worker kthread be SCHED_DEADLINE Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 18:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:31     ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 19:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:01     ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 19:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-23 23:30     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-24  7:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:01         ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] sched/sched.h: remove sd arch_scale_freq_capacity parameter Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] sched/sched.h: move arch_scale_{freq,cpu}_capacity outside CONFIG_SMP Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] sched/deadline: make bandwidth enforcement scale-invariant Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 20:23 ` [PATCH RFC 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-23 20:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:25   ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-24  9:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:50       ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-24 11:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24 10:01     ` Luca Abeni
2017-05-24 11:29       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170523085351.18586-6-juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=andresoportus@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox