Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it,
	claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
	bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
	tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com, andresoportus@google.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	patrick.bellasi@arm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make worker kthread be SCHED_DEADLINE
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 20:52:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170523185222.sewatquohs3vuped@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170523085351.18586-4-juri.lelli@arm.com>

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:53:46AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> index e2a6c7b3510b..72723859ef74 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> @@ -48,5 +48,6 @@
>   */
>  #define SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK	0x01
>  #define SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM		0x02
> +#define SCHED_FLAG_SPECIAL		0x04
>  
>  #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_SCHED_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7fc2011c3ce7..ba57e2ef9aef 100644

> @@ -4205,7 +4212,9 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (attr->sched_flags &
> -		~(SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK | SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM))
> +		~(SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK |
> +		  SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM |
> +		  SCHED_FLAG_SPECIAL))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/*

Could we pretty please not expose this gruesome hack to userspace?

So if you stick it in attr->sched_flags, use a high bit and don't put it
in a uapi header. Also make the flags check explicitly fail on it when
@user. Such that only _nocheck() (and thus kernel) callers have access
to it.

Also, there's not nearly enough warnings and other derisory comments
near it.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-23 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-23  8:53 [PATCH RFC 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make use of DEADLINE utilization signal Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection triggering points Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make worker kthread be SCHED_DEADLINE Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 18:52   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-05-24  9:31     ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 19:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:01     ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 19:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-23 23:30     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-24  7:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:01         ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] sched/sched.h: remove sd arch_scale_freq_capacity parameter Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] sched/sched.h: move arch_scale_{freq,cpu}_capacity outside CONFIG_SMP Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] sched/deadline: make bandwidth enforcement scale-invariant Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 20:23 ` [PATCH RFC 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-23 20:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:25   ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-24  9:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:50       ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-24 11:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24 10:01     ` Luca Abeni
2017-05-24 11:29       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170523185222.sewatquohs3vuped@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=andresoportus@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox