From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@gmail.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
eas-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 08:54:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170630032404.GS29665@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0g0Lo2mJzjs_WcHuCFRNMcLpU5GUhDKghFeMtxTTzbKYA@mail.gmail.com>
On 29-06-17, 22:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> There is no way I could consider this for inclusion into 4.13, so I'm
> not sure why you chose this specific timing.
Sure, I don't aim at getting it merged for 4.13. I sent it now to get
some early feedback, so that it is ready for inclusion for the 4.14
merge window.
Isn't it fine to send such patches anytime? Should I avoid sending
such changes around merge window ?
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-30 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-29 5:26 [PATCH V2 0/4] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 5:26 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Process remote callback for shared policies Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 5:26 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] cpufreq: governor: " Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 5:26 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] intel_pstate: Ignore scheduler cpufreq callbacks on remote CPUs Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 21:23 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-06-30 3:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-12 23:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-29 5:26 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] sched: cpufreq: Enable remote sched cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 20:30 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-30 3:24 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-07-12 23:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170630032404.GS29665@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=eas-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=smuckle.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox