From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Raju P . L . S . S . S . N" <rplsssn@codeaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] PM / Domains: Search for the CPU device outside the genpd lock
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:04:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425090413.10700-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425090413.10700-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
While attaching/detaching a device to a PM domain (genpd) that has the
GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN set, genpd iterates the cpu_possible_mask to check
whether the device corresponds to a CPU. This iteration is done while
holding the genpd's lock, which is unnecessary. Let's avoid the locking,
by restructuring the corresponding code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
drivers/base/power/domain.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index 93298b7db408..da1c99178943 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -1450,8 +1450,8 @@ static void genpd_free_dev_data(struct device *dev,
dev_pm_put_subsys_data(dev);
}
-static void __genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
- int cpu, bool set, unsigned int depth)
+static void genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
+ int cpu, bool set, unsigned int depth)
{
struct gpd_link *link;
@@ -1462,7 +1462,7 @@ static void __genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
struct generic_pm_domain *master = link->master;
genpd_lock_nested(master, depth + 1);
- __genpd_update_cpumask(master, cpu, set, depth + 1);
+ genpd_update_cpumask(master, cpu, set, depth + 1);
genpd_unlock(master);
}
@@ -1472,38 +1472,37 @@ static void __genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, genpd->cpus);
}
-static void genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
- struct device *dev, bool set)
+static void genpd_set_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, int cpu)
+{
+ if (cpu >= 0)
+ genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, cpu, true, 0);
+}
+
+static void genpd_clear_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, int cpu)
+{
+ if (cpu >= 0)
+ genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, cpu, false, 0);
+}
+
+static int genpd_get_cpu(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
{
int cpu;
if (!genpd_is_cpu_domain(genpd))
- return;
+ return -1;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- if (get_cpu_device(cpu) == dev) {
- __genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, cpu, set, 0);
- return;
- }
+ if (get_cpu_device(cpu) == dev)
+ return cpu;
}
-}
-static void genpd_set_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
- struct device *dev)
-{
- genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, dev, true);
-}
-
-static void genpd_clear_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
- struct device *dev)
-{
- genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, dev, false);
+ return -1;
}
static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
- int ret;
+ int ret, cpu;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
@@ -1514,13 +1513,15 @@ static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
if (IS_ERR(gpd_data))
return PTR_ERR(gpd_data);
+ cpu = genpd_get_cpu(genpd, dev);
+
ret = genpd->attach_dev ? genpd->attach_dev(genpd, dev) : 0;
if (ret)
goto out;
genpd_lock(genpd);
- genpd_set_cpumask(genpd, dev);
+ genpd_set_cpumask(genpd, cpu);
dev_pm_domain_set(dev, &genpd->domain);
genpd->device_count++;
@@ -1560,13 +1561,14 @@ static int genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
{
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
- int ret = 0;
+ int cpu, ret = 0;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
pdd = dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data;
gpd_data = to_gpd_data(pdd);
dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(dev, &gpd_data->nb);
+ cpu = genpd_get_cpu(genpd, dev);
genpd_lock(genpd);
@@ -1578,7 +1580,7 @@ static int genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
genpd->device_count--;
genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
- genpd_clear_cpumask(genpd, dev);
+ genpd_clear_cpumask(genpd, cpu);
dev_pm_domain_set(dev, NULL);
list_del_init(&pdd->list_node);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-25 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-25 9:04 [PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Improve support for CPUs in genpd Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 9:04 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 9:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM / Domains: Use the base device for driver_deferred_probe_check_state() Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 9:04 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 9:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 9:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 9:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM / Domains: Drop unused in-parameter to some genpd functions Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 9:04 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 9:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 9:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 9:04 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2019-04-25 9:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM / Domains: Search for the CPU device outside the genpd lock Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 9:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 9:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 10:14 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:14 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 9:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM / Domains: Allow to attach a CPU via genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id|name() Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 9:04 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 9:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 9:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 9:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Improve support for CPUs in genpd Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 9:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 10:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 10:17 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:17 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 10:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-01 10:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-01 10:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190425090413.10700-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rplsssn@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox