public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"Raju P . L . S . S . S . N" <rplsssn@codeaurora.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] PM / Domains: Search for the CPU device outside the genpd lock
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:04:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425090413.10700-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425090413.10700-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

While attaching/detaching a device to a PM domain (genpd) that has the
GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN set, genpd iterates the cpu_possible_mask to check
whether the device corresponds to a CPU. This iteration is done while
holding the genpd's lock, which is unnecessary. Let's avoid the locking,
by restructuring the corresponding code a bit.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/base/power/domain.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index 93298b7db408..da1c99178943 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -1450,8 +1450,8 @@ static void genpd_free_dev_data(struct device *dev,
 	dev_pm_put_subsys_data(dev);
 }
 
-static void __genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
-				   int cpu, bool set, unsigned int depth)
+static void genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
+				 int cpu, bool set, unsigned int depth)
 {
 	struct gpd_link *link;
 
@@ -1462,7 +1462,7 @@ static void __genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
 		struct generic_pm_domain *master = link->master;
 
 		genpd_lock_nested(master, depth + 1);
-		__genpd_update_cpumask(master, cpu, set, depth + 1);
+		genpd_update_cpumask(master, cpu, set, depth + 1);
 		genpd_unlock(master);
 	}
 
@@ -1472,38 +1472,37 @@ static void __genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, genpd->cpus);
 }
 
-static void genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
-				 struct device *dev, bool set)
+static void genpd_set_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, int cpu)
+{
+	if (cpu >= 0)
+		genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, cpu, true, 0);
+}
+
+static void genpd_clear_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, int cpu)
+{
+	if (cpu >= 0)
+		genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, cpu, false, 0);
+}
+
+static int genpd_get_cpu(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
 {
 	int cpu;
 
 	if (!genpd_is_cpu_domain(genpd))
-		return;
+		return -1;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (get_cpu_device(cpu) == dev) {
-			__genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, cpu, set, 0);
-			return;
-		}
+		if (get_cpu_device(cpu) == dev)
+			return cpu;
 	}
-}
 
-static void genpd_set_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
-			      struct device *dev)
-{
-	genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, dev, true);
-}
-
-static void genpd_clear_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
-				struct device *dev)
-{
-	genpd_update_cpumask(genpd, dev, false);
+	return -1;
 }
 
 static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
-	int ret;
+	int ret, cpu;
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
@@ -1514,13 +1513,15 @@ static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev)
 	if (IS_ERR(gpd_data))
 		return PTR_ERR(gpd_data);
 
+	cpu = genpd_get_cpu(genpd, dev);
+
 	ret = genpd->attach_dev ? genpd->attach_dev(genpd, dev) : 0;
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
 	genpd_lock(genpd);
 
-	genpd_set_cpumask(genpd, dev);
+	genpd_set_cpumask(genpd, cpu);
 	dev_pm_domain_set(dev, &genpd->domain);
 
 	genpd->device_count++;
@@ -1560,13 +1561,14 @@ static int genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
 {
 	struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
 	struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int cpu, ret = 0;
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
 	pdd = dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data;
 	gpd_data = to_gpd_data(pdd);
 	dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(dev, &gpd_data->nb);
+	cpu = genpd_get_cpu(genpd, dev);
 
 	genpd_lock(genpd);
 
@@ -1578,7 +1580,7 @@ static int genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
 	genpd->device_count--;
 	genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
 
-	genpd_clear_cpumask(genpd, dev);
+	genpd_clear_cpumask(genpd, cpu);
 	dev_pm_domain_set(dev, NULL);
 
 	list_del_init(&pdd->list_node);
-- 
2.17.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-25  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-25  9:04 [PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Improve support for CPUs in genpd Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25  9:04 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25  9:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM / Domains: Use the base device for driver_deferred_probe_check_state() Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25  9:04   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25  9:39   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25  9:39     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25  9:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM / Domains: Drop unused in-parameter to some genpd functions Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25  9:04   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25  9:40   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25  9:40     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25  9:04 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2019-04-25  9:04   ` [PATCH 3/4] PM / Domains: Search for the CPU device outside the genpd lock Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25  9:45   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25  9:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 10:14     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:14       ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:17   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25 10:17     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25  9:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM / Domains: Allow to attach a CPU via genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id|name() Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25  9:04   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25  9:47   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25  9:47     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-25  9:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Improve support for CPUs in genpd Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25  9:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 10:11   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:11     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:14     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 10:14       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 10:17       ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:17         ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-25 10:32         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 10:32           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-01 10:42           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-01 10:42             ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190425090413.10700-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.cassel@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rplsssn@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox