public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI/AER: Disable AER service when link is in L2/L3 ready, L2 and L3 state
       [not found] <20220422222433.GA1464120@bhelgaas>
@ 2022-04-22 22:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2022-07-01  4:06   ` Kai-Heng Feng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2022-04-22 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kai-Heng Feng
  Cc: bhelgaas, mika.westerberg, koba.ko, baolu.lu,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy, Russell Currey, Oliver O'Halloran,
	linuxppc-dev, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Rajvi Jingar, david.e.box,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm

[+cc Rafael, linux-pm; sorry forgot this last time]

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 05:24:36PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:31:58PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > On Intel Alder Lake platforms, Thunderbolt entering D3cold can cause
> > some errors reported by AER:
> > [   30.100211] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: 0000:00:1d.0
> > [   30.100251] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Requester ID)
> > [   30.100256] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:   device [8086:7ab0] error status/mask=00100000/00004000
> > [   30.100262] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:    [20] UnsupReq               (First)
> > [   30.100267] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER:   TLP Header: 34000000 08000052 00000000 00000000
> > [   30.100372] thunderbolt 0000:0a:00.0: AER: can't recover (no error_detected callback)
> > [   30.100401] xhci_hcd 0000:3e:00.0: AER: can't recover (no error_detected callback)
> > [   30.100427] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: device recovery failed
> > 
> > So disable AER service to avoid the noises from turning power rails
> > on/off when the device is in low power states (D3hot and D3cold), as
> > PCIe Base Spec 5.0, section 5.2 "Link State Power Management" states
> > that TLP and DLLP transmission is disabled for a Link in L2/L3 Ready
> > (D3hot), L2 (D3cold with aux power) and L3 (D3cold).
> 
> Help me walk through what's happening here, because I'm never very
> confident about how error reporting works.  I *think* the Unsupported
> Request error means some request was in progress and was not
> completed.  I don't think a link going down should by itself cause
> an Unsupported Request error because there's no *request*.
> 
> I have a theory about what happened here.  Decoding the TLP Header
> (from PCIe r6.0, sec 2.2.1.1, 2.2.8.10) gives:
> 
>   34000000 (0011 0100 ...):
>     Fmt               001        4 DW header, no data
>     Type           1 0100        Msg, Local - Terminate at Receiver
> 
>   08000052 (0800 ... 0101 0010)
>     Requester ID     0800        00:08.0
>     Message Code     0101 0010   PTM Request
> 
> From your lspci in bugzilla, 08:00 has PTM enabled.  So my theory is
> that:
> 
>   - 08:00.0 sent a PTM Request Message (a Posted Request)
>   - 00:1d.0 received the PTM Request Message
>   - The link transitioned to DL_Down
>   - Per sec 2.9.1, 00:1d.0 discarded the Request and reported an
>     Unsupported Request
>   - Or, per sec 6.21.3, if 00:1d.0 received a PTM Request when its
>     own PTM Enable was clear, it would also be treated as an
>     Unsupported Request
> 
> So I suspect we should disable PTM on 08:00.0 before putting it in a
> low-power state.  If you manually disable PTM on 08:00.0, do these
> errors stop happening?
> 
> David did something like this [1], but just for Root Ports.  That
> looks wrong to me because sec 6.21.3 says we should not have PTM
> enabled in an Upstream Port (i.e., in a downstream device like
> 08:00.0) unless it is already enabled in the Downstream Port (i.e., in
> the Root Port 00:1d.0).
> 
> Nit: can you remove the timestamps from the log?  They add clutter but
> no useful information.
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/a697f072f5da
> 
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215453
> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > v4:
> >  - Explicitly states the spec version.
> >  - Wording change. 
> > 
> > v3:
> >  - Remove reference to ACS.
> >  - Wording change.
> > 
> > v2:
> >  - Wording change.
> > 
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > index 9fa1f97e5b270..e4e9d4a3098d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > @@ -1367,6 +1367,22 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device *dev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int aer_suspend(struct pcie_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct aer_rpc *rpc = get_service_data(dev);
> > +
> > +	aer_disable_rootport(rpc);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int aer_resume(struct pcie_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct aer_rpc *rpc = get_service_data(dev);
> > +
> > +	aer_enable_rootport(rpc);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * aer_root_reset - reset Root Port hierarchy, RCEC, or RCiEP
> >   * @dev: pointer to Root Port, RCEC, or RCiEP
> > @@ -1433,12 +1449,15 @@ static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static struct pcie_port_service_driver aerdriver = {
> > -	.name		= "aer",
> > -	.port_type	= PCIE_ANY_PORT,
> > -	.service	= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER,
> > -
> > -	.probe		= aer_probe,
> > -	.remove		= aer_remove,
> > +	.name			= "aer",
> > +	.port_type		= PCIE_ANY_PORT,
> > +	.service		= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER,
> > +	.probe			= aer_probe,
> > +	.suspend		= aer_suspend,
> > +	.resume			= aer_resume,
> > +	.runtime_suspend	= aer_suspend,
> > +	.runtime_resume		= aer_resume,
> > +	.remove			= aer_remove,
> >  };
> >  
> >  /**
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI/AER: Disable AER service when link is in L2/L3 ready, L2 and L3 state
  2022-04-22 22:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI/AER: Disable AER service when link is in L2/L3 ready, L2 and L3 state Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2022-07-01  4:06   ` Kai-Heng Feng
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kai-Heng Feng @ 2022-07-01  4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: bhelgaas, mika.westerberg, koba.ko, baolu.lu,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy, Russell Currey, Oliver O'Halloran,
	linuxppc-dev, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Rajvi Jingar, david.e.box,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 6:26 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> [+cc Rafael, linux-pm; sorry forgot this last time]
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 05:24:36PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:31:58PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > > On Intel Alder Lake platforms, Thunderbolt entering D3cold can cause
> > > some errors reported by AER:
> > > [   30.100211] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: 0000:00:1d.0
> > > [   30.100251] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Requester ID)
> > > [   30.100256] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:   device [8086:7ab0] error status/mask=00100000/00004000
> > > [   30.100262] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:    [20] UnsupReq               (First)
> > > [   30.100267] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER:   TLP Header: 34000000 08000052 00000000 00000000
> > > [   30.100372] thunderbolt 0000:0a:00.0: AER: can't recover (no error_detected callback)
> > > [   30.100401] xhci_hcd 0000:3e:00.0: AER: can't recover (no error_detected callback)
> > > [   30.100427] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: device recovery failed
> > >
> > > So disable AER service to avoid the noises from turning power rails
> > > on/off when the device is in low power states (D3hot and D3cold), as
> > > PCIe Base Spec 5.0, section 5.2 "Link State Power Management" states
> > > that TLP and DLLP transmission is disabled for a Link in L2/L3 Ready
> > > (D3hot), L2 (D3cold with aux power) and L3 (D3cold).
> >
> > Help me walk through what's happening here, because I'm never very
> > confident about how error reporting works.  I *think* the Unsupported
> > Request error means some request was in progress and was not
> > completed.  I don't think a link going down should by itself cause
> > an Unsupported Request error because there's no *request*.
> >
> > I have a theory about what happened here.  Decoding the TLP Header
> > (from PCIe r6.0, sec 2.2.1.1, 2.2.8.10) gives:
> >
> >   34000000 (0011 0100 ...):
> >     Fmt               001        4 DW header, no data
> >     Type           1 0100        Msg, Local - Terminate at Receiver
> >
> >   08000052 (0800 ... 0101 0010)
> >     Requester ID     0800        00:08.0
> >     Message Code     0101 0010   PTM Request

Is there any TLP decoder software available? That will be really
helpful for debugging.

> >
> > From your lspci in bugzilla, 08:00 has PTM enabled.  So my theory is
> > that:
> >
> >   - 08:00.0 sent a PTM Request Message (a Posted Request)
> >   - 00:1d.0 received the PTM Request Message
> >   - The link transitioned to DL_Down
> >   - Per sec 2.9.1, 00:1d.0 discarded the Request and reported an
> >     Unsupported Request
> >   - Or, per sec 6.21.3, if 00:1d.0 received a PTM Request when its
> >     own PTM Enable was clear, it would also be treated as an
> >     Unsupported Request
> >
> > So I suspect we should disable PTM on 08:00.0 before putting it in a
> > low-power state.  If you manually disable PTM on 08:00.0, do these
> > errors stop happening?

Yes, disabling PTM on upstream port can solve the issue.
Thanks for find the root cause!

> >
> > David did something like this [1], but just for Root Ports.  That
> > looks wrong to me because sec 6.21.3 says we should not have PTM
> > enabled in an Upstream Port (i.e., in a downstream device like
> > 08:00.0) unless it is already enabled in the Downstream Port (i.e., in
> > the Root Port 00:1d.0).

So I think it should be like this?
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index cfaf40a540a82..8ba8a0e12946e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -2717,7 +2717,8 @@ int pci_prepare_to_sleep(struct pci_dev *dev)
         * port to enter a lower-power PM state and the SoC to reach a
         * lower-power idle state as a whole.
         */
-       if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
+       if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
+           pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM)
                pci_disable_ptm(dev);

        pci_enable_wake(dev, target_state, wakeup);
@@ -2775,7 +2776,8 @@ int pci_finish_runtime_suspend(struct pci_dev *dev)
         * port to enter a lower-power PM state and the SoC to reach a
         * lower-power idle state as a whole.
         */
-       if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
+       if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
+           pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM)
                pci_disable_ptm(dev);

        __pci_enable_wake(dev, target_state, pci_dev_run_wake(dev));


> >
> > Nit: can you remove the timestamps from the log?  They add clutter but
> > no useful information.

Sure.

> >
> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/a697f072f5da
> >
> > > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215453
> > > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > > v4:
> > >  - Explicitly states the spec version.
> > >  - Wording change.
> > >
> > > v3:
> > >  - Remove reference to ACS.
> > >  - Wording change.
> > >
> > > v2:
> > >  - Wording change.
> > >
> > >  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > > index 9fa1f97e5b270..e4e9d4a3098d7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > > @@ -1367,6 +1367,22 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device *dev)
> > >     return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int aer_suspend(struct pcie_device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct aer_rpc *rpc = get_service_data(dev);
> > > +
> > > +   aer_disable_rootport(rpc);
> > > +   return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int aer_resume(struct pcie_device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct aer_rpc *rpc = get_service_data(dev);
> > > +
> > > +   aer_enable_rootport(rpc);
> > > +   return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * aer_root_reset - reset Root Port hierarchy, RCEC, or RCiEP
> > >   * @dev: pointer to Root Port, RCEC, or RCiEP
> > > @@ -1433,12 +1449,15 @@ static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static struct pcie_port_service_driver aerdriver = {
> > > -   .name           = "aer",
> > > -   .port_type      = PCIE_ANY_PORT,
> > > -   .service        = PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER,
> > > -
> > > -   .probe          = aer_probe,
> > > -   .remove         = aer_remove,
> > > +   .name                   = "aer",
> > > +   .port_type              = PCIE_ANY_PORT,
> > > +   .service                = PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER,
> > > +   .probe                  = aer_probe,
> > > +   .suspend                = aer_suspend,
> > > +   .resume                 = aer_resume,
> > > +   .runtime_suspend        = aer_suspend,
> > > +   .runtime_resume         = aer_resume,
> > > +   .remove                 = aer_remove,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  /**
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-01  4:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20220422222433.GA1464120@bhelgaas>
2022-04-22 22:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI/AER: Disable AER service when link is in L2/L3 ready, L2 and L3 state Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-01  4:06   ` Kai-Heng Feng

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox