Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: Split cpufreq_offline()
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 12:58:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220512072809.aztba67eummh2amf@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2258373.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher>

On 11-05-22, 17:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Split the "core" part running under the policy rwsem out of
> cpufreq_offline() to allow the locking in cpufreq_remove_dev() to be
> rearranged more easily.
> 
> As a side-effect this eliminates the unlock label that's not needed
> any more.
> 
> No expected functional impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-12  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 15:46 [PATCH v1 0/3] cpufreq: Locking-related changes in cpufreq_offline() and cpufreq_remove_dev() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-11 15:48 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] cpufreq: Reorganize checks in cpufreq_offline() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-12  7:05   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-11 15:50 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: Split cpufreq_offline() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-12  7:28   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2022-05-11 15:51 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] cpufreq: Rearrange locking in cpufreq_remove_dev() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-12  7:42   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220512072809.aztba67eummh2amf@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox