Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cpufreq: Rearrange locking in cpufreq_remove_dev()

[Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>]

On 11-05-22, 17:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Currently, cpufreq_remove_dev() invokes the ->exit() driver callback
> without holding the policy rwsem which is inconsistent with what
> happens if ->exit() is invoked directly from cpufreq_offline().
> 
> It also manipulates the real_cpus mask and removes the CPU device
> symlink without holding the policy rwsem, but cpufreq_offline() holds
> the rwsem around the modifications thereof.
> 
> For consistency, modify cpufreq_remove_dev() to hold the policy rwsem
> until the ->exit() callback has been called (or it has been determined
> that it is not necessary to call it).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   21 ++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh