Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iopoll: Do not use timekeeping in read_poll_timeout_atomic()
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 09:48:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230511064805.GF14287@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8db63020d18fc22e137e4a8f0aa15e6b9949a6f6.1683722688.git.geert+renesas@glider.be>

Hi,

* Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> [230510 13:23]:
> read_poll_timeout_atomic() uses ktime_get() to implement the timeout
> feature, just like its non-atomic counterpart.  However, there are
> several issues with this, due to its use in atomic contexts:
> 
>   1. When called in the s2ram path (as typically done by clock or PM
>      domain drivers), timekeeping may be suspended, triggering the
>      WARN_ON(timekeeping_suspended) in ktime_get():

Maybe add a comment to read_poll_timeout_atomic() saying it can be
used also with timekeeping_suspended?

Otherwise a few years later it might get broken when somebody goes
to patch it without testing it with timekeeping_suspended :)

Other than that looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-11  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-10 13:23 [PATCH v2 0/2] iopoll: Busy loop and timeout improvements Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-10 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iopoll: Call cpu_relax() in busy loops Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-11  6:48   ` Tony Lindgren
2023-05-11 10:48     ` David Laight
2023-05-23  7:29       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-23  8:55         ` David Laight
2023-05-11  9:48   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-05-10 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iopoll: Do not use timekeeping in read_poll_timeout_atomic() Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-10 13:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-10 13:46     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-10 13:56       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-11  6:48   ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2023-05-11 10:26   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-05-11 12:44     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-12  7:53       ` Ulf Hansson
2023-05-12  8:03         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-15  9:26           ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230511064805.GF14287@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tero.kristo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=zhengdejin5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox