* [PATCH v2 0/2] Support building tegra124-cpufreq as a module
@ 2025-04-21 8:13 Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-04-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Remove use of disable_cpufreq Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-04-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Kling via B4 Relay @ 2025-04-21 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, linux-tegra, Aaron Kling
This adds remove and exit routines that were not previously needed when
this was only available builtin. It also converts use of an unexported
function to a more sane alternative.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Replace patch 1 with a patch to not use the unexported function
- Update patch 2 to add remove and exit routines
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250420-tegra124-cpufreq-v1-0-0a47fe126091@gmail.com
---
Aaron Kling (2):
cpufreq: tegra124: Remove use of disable_cpufreq
cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 91e5bfe317d8f8471fbaa3e70cf66cae1314a516
change-id: 20250401-tegra124-cpufreq-fd944fdce62c
Best regards,
--
Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Remove use of disable_cpufreq
2025-04-21 8:13 [PATCH v2 0/2] Support building tegra124-cpufreq as a module Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
@ 2025-04-21 8:13 ` Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-04-21 10:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-04-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Kling via B4 Relay @ 2025-04-21 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, linux-tegra, Aaron Kling
From: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
Instead, unregister the cpufreq device for this fatal fail case.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
index 514146d98bca2d8aa59980a14dff3487cd8045f6..dc83b1631b13ec428f3b6bbea89462448a62adb4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
@@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused tegra124_cpufreq_resume(struct device *dev)
disable_dfll:
clk_disable_unprepare(priv->dfll_clk);
disable_cpufreq:
- disable_cpufreq();
+ if (!IS_ERR(priv->cpufreq_dt_pdev))
+ platform_device_unregister(priv->cpufreq_dt_pdev);
return err;
}
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module
2025-04-21 8:13 [PATCH v2 0/2] Support building tegra124-cpufreq as a module Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-04-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Remove use of disable_cpufreq Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
@ 2025-04-21 8:13 ` Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-04-21 10:58 ` Viresh Kumar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Kling via B4 Relay @ 2025-04-21 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, linux-tegra, Aaron Kling
From: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
This requires three changes:
* A soft dependency on cpufreq-dt as this driver only handles power
management and cpufreq-dt does the real operations
* Adding a remove routine to remove the cpufreq-dt device
* Adding a exit routine to handle cleaning up the driver
Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index 4f9cb943d945c244eb2b29f543d14df6cac4e5d4..625f6fbdaaf5fd774e3b0bb996eb7ce980da41ee 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ config ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ
This adds the CPUFreq driver support for Tegra20/30 SOCs.
config ARM_TEGRA124_CPUFREQ
- bool "Tegra124 CPUFreq support"
+ tristate "Tegra124 CPUFreq support"
depends on ARCH_TEGRA || COMPILE_TEST
depends on CPUFREQ_DT
default y
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
index dc83b1631b13ec428f3b6bbea89462448a62adb4..17f51592bf9fe75921ab4fc4125908e5d941e468 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+static struct platform_device *platform_device;
+
struct tegra124_cpufreq_priv {
struct clk *cpu_clk;
struct clk *pllp_clk;
@@ -174,6 +176,14 @@ static int __maybe_unused tegra124_cpufreq_resume(struct device *dev)
return err;
}
+static void tegra124_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct tegra124_cpufreq_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(priv->cpufreq_dt_pdev))
+ platform_device_unregister(priv->cpufreq_dt_pdev);
+}
+
static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra124_cpufreq_pm_ops = {
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra124_cpufreq_suspend,
tegra124_cpufreq_resume)
@@ -183,12 +193,12 @@ static struct platform_driver tegra124_cpufreq_platdrv = {
.driver.name = "cpufreq-tegra124",
.driver.pm = &tegra124_cpufreq_pm_ops,
.probe = tegra124_cpufreq_probe,
+ .remove = tegra124_cpufreq_remove,
};
static int __init tegra_cpufreq_init(void)
{
int ret;
- struct platform_device *pdev;
if (!(of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,tegra124") ||
of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,tegra210")))
@@ -202,15 +212,25 @@ static int __init tegra_cpufreq_init(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
- pdev = platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-tegra124", -1, NULL, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
+ platform_device = platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-tegra124", -1, NULL, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(platform_device)) {
platform_driver_unregister(&tegra124_cpufreq_platdrv);
- return PTR_ERR(pdev);
+ return PTR_ERR(platform_device);
}
return 0;
}
module_init(tegra_cpufreq_init);
+static void __exit tegra_cpufreq_module_exit(void)
+{
+ if (!IS_ERR(platform_device))
+ platform_device_unregister(platform_device);
+ platform_driver_unregister(&tegra124_cpufreq_platdrv);
+}
+module_exit(tegra_cpufreq_module_exit);
+
+MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cpufreq-dt");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@nvidia.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("cpufreq driver for NVIDIA Tegra124");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Remove use of disable_cpufreq
2025-04-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Remove use of disable_cpufreq Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
@ 2025-04-21 10:56 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2025-04-21 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: webgeek1234
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, linux-tegra
On 21-04-25, 03:13, Aaron Kling via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
>
> Instead, unregister the cpufreq device for this fatal fail case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
> index 514146d98bca2d8aa59980a14dff3487cd8045f6..dc83b1631b13ec428f3b6bbea89462448a62adb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused tegra124_cpufreq_resume(struct device *dev)
> disable_dfll:
> clk_disable_unprepare(priv->dfll_clk);
> disable_cpufreq:
> - disable_cpufreq();
> + if (!IS_ERR(priv->cpufreq_dt_pdev))
> + platform_device_unregister(priv->cpufreq_dt_pdev);
What if someone tries to remove the module after this ? Won't we try
this again ? Shouldn't we set the cpufreq_dt_pdev to some sort of
error to skip doing that ?
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module
2025-04-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
@ 2025-04-21 10:58 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2025-04-21 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: webgeek1234
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, linux-tegra
On 21-04-25, 03:13, Aaron Kling via B4 Relay wrote:
> +static void tegra124_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct tegra124_cpufreq_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(priv->cpufreq_dt_pdev))
> + platform_device_unregister(priv->cpufreq_dt_pdev);
> +}
Ideally this should undo everything probe() would have done. There are
a lot of clk_put() calls in the error path of probe, I think they must
be done here ?
Also I would require an Ack from Thierry or some other maintainer of
the driver to get these changes in.
Thanks.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-21 10:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-21 8:13 [PATCH v2 0/2] Support building tegra124-cpufreq as a module Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-04-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Remove use of disable_cpufreq Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-04-21 10:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-04-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-04-21 10:58 ` Viresh Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox