[GIT PULL] Immutable tag between the pwrseq, drm and pmdomain trees for v6.17-rc1

[GIT PULL] Immutable tag between the pwrseq, drm and pmdomain trees for v6.17-rc1

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Here's an immutable tag containing the thead 1520 power sequencing driver
for the drm and pmdomain trees to pull from.

Best Regards,
Bartosz Golaszewski

The following changes since commit 19272b37aa4f83ca52bdf9c16d5d81bdd1354494:

  Linux 6.16-rc1 (2025-06-08 13:44:43 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git tags/pwrseq-th1520-driver-for-v6.17

for you to fetch changes up to d4c2d9b5b7ceed14a3a835fd969bb0699b9608d3:

  power: sequencing: Add T-HEAD TH1520 GPU power sequencer driver (2025-06-24 15:55:05 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Immutable tag between the pwrseq, drm and pmdomain trees

Add the T-HEAD TH1520 GPU power sequencer driver

----------------------------------------------------------------
Michal Wilczynski (1):
      power: sequencing: Add T-HEAD TH1520 GPU power sequencer driver

 MAINTAINERS                                 |   1 +
 drivers/power/sequencing/Kconfig            |   8 +
 drivers/power/sequencing/Makefile           |   1 +
 drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-thead-gpu.c | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 257 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-thead-gpu.c

Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable tag between the pwrseq, drm and pmdomain trees for v6.17-rc1

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 4:10 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> Here's an immutable tag containing the thead 1520 power sequencing driver
> for the drm and pmdomain trees to pull from.
>
> Best Regards,
> Bartosz Golaszewski

Just an FYI - there don't seem to be any actual build-time
dependencies between this driver and the rest of the code that uses it
(thanks to the aux bus usage etc.) so Michal, Ulf et al: you can
probably skip the pull if you can rely on this being available in
linux-next for run-time testing.

Bartosz

Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable tag between the pwrseq, drm and pmdomain trees for v6.17-rc1

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 923 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 04:40:43PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 4:10 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Here's an immutable tag containing the thead 1520 power sequencing driver
> > for the drm and pmdomain trees to pull from.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Bartosz Golaszewski
> 
> Just an FYI - there don't seem to be any actual build-time
> dependencies between this driver and the rest of the code that uses it
> (thanks to the aux bus usage etc.) so Michal, Ulf et al: you can
> probably skip the pull if you can rely on this being available in
> linux-next for run-time testing.

Yeah, I was about to say I don't think we will pull it in DRM. As far as
I know, it's only about runtime dependencies that will be reconciled
when all the trees will be merged by Linus.

Maxime

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]

Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable tag between the pwrseq, drm and pmdomain trees for v6.17-rc1

[Ulf Hansson]

On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 16:40, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 4:10 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Here's an immutable tag containing the thead 1520 power sequencing driver
> > for the drm and pmdomain trees to pull from.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Bartosz Golaszewski
>
> Just an FYI - there don't seem to be any actual build-time
> dependencies between this driver and the rest of the code that uses it
> (thanks to the aux bus usage etc.) so Michal, Ulf et al: you can
> probably skip the pull if you can rely on this being available in
> linux-next for run-time testing.

Good point, I am not pulling the tag then!

Kind regards
Uffe