* [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only()
@ 2025-09-11 11:16 Pin-yen Lin
2025-09-11 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PM: sleep: Don't wait for SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links Pin-yen Lin
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pin-yen Lin @ 2025-09-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
Danilo Krummrich, Saravana Kannan
Cc: Hsin-Te Yuan, linux-pm, Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-kernel, Pin-yen Lin
Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() for future patches.
Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- New in v2
drivers/base/core.c | 3 ++-
include/linux/device.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index d22d6b23e758..cc6af9b0d59d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -287,10 +287,11 @@ static bool device_is_ancestor(struct device *dev, struct device *target)
#define DL_MARKER_FLAGS (DL_FLAG_INFERRED | \
DL_FLAG_CYCLE | \
DL_FLAG_MANAGED)
-static inline bool device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(u32 flags)
+bool device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(u32 flags)
{
return (flags & ~DL_MARKER_FLAGS) == DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only);
/**
* device_is_dependent - Check if one device depends on another one
diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
index 0470d19da7f2..e27d0bf7c43d 100644
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -1197,6 +1197,7 @@ const char *dev_driver_string(const struct device *dev);
struct device_link *device_link_add(struct device *consumer,
struct device *supplier, u32 flags);
void device_link_del(struct device_link *link);
+bool device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(u32 flags);
void device_link_remove(void *consumer, struct device *supplier);
void device_links_supplier_sync_state_pause(void);
void device_links_supplier_sync_state_resume(void);
--
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] PM: sleep: Don't wait for SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links
2025-09-11 11:16 [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() Pin-yen Lin
@ 2025-09-11 11:16 ` Pin-yen Lin
2025-09-11 12:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-11 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-11 12:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pin-yen Lin @ 2025-09-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
Danilo Krummrich, Saravana Kannan
Cc: Hsin-Te Yuan, linux-pm, Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-kernel, Pin-yen Lin
Device links with DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY should not affect suspend
and resume, and functions like device_reorder_to_tail() and
device_link_add() doesn't try to reorder the consumers with such flag.
However, dpm_wait_for_consumers() and dpm_wait_for_suppliers() doesn't
check this flag before triggering dpm_wait, leading to potential hang
during suspend/resume.
This can be reproduced on MT8186 Corsola Chromebook with devicetree like:
usb-a-connector {
compatible = "usb-a-connector";
port {
usb_a_con: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&usb_hs>;
};
};
};
usb_host {
compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-xhci", "mediatek,mtk-xhci";
port {
usb_hs: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&usb_a_con>;
};
};
};
In this case, the two nodes form a cycle and a SYNC_STATE_ONLY devlink
between usb_host (supplier) and usb-a-connector (consumer) is created.
Use device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() to check this in
dpm_wait_for_consumers() and dpm_wait_for_suppliers() to fix this.
Fixes: 05ef983e0d65a ("driver core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag")
Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update commit message
- Use device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only()
drivers/base/power/main.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
index 2ea6e05e6ec9..73a1916170ae 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool async)
* walking.
*/
list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
- if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
+ if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT &&
+ !device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(link->flags))
dpm_wait(link->supplier, async);
device_links_read_unlock(idx);
@@ -339,7 +340,8 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async)
* unregistration).
*/
list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node)
- if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
+ if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT &&
+ !device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(link->flags))
dpm_wait(link->consumer, async);
device_links_read_unlock(idx);
--
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only()
2025-09-11 11:16 [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() Pin-yen Lin
2025-09-11 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PM: sleep: Don't wait for SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links Pin-yen Lin
@ 2025-09-11 12:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-11 12:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-09-11 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pin-yen Lin
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Danilo Krummrich,
Saravana Kannan, Hsin-Te Yuan, linux-pm, Chen-Yu Tsai,
linux-kernel
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 07:16:02PM +0800, Pin-yen Lin wrote:
> Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() for future patches.
That says what, but not why. This feels like an odd thing to export,
what should care about this type of thing? What should a driver do
based on that information? We need more information here.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PM: sleep: Don't wait for SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links
2025-09-11 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PM: sleep: Don't wait for SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links Pin-yen Lin
@ 2025-09-11 12:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-11 12:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-09-11 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pin-yen Lin
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Danilo Krummrich,
Saravana Kannan, Hsin-Te Yuan, linux-pm, Chen-Yu Tsai,
linux-kernel
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 07:16:03PM +0800, Pin-yen Lin wrote:
> Device links with DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY should not affect suspend
> and resume, and functions like device_reorder_to_tail() and
> device_link_add() doesn't try to reorder the consumers with such flag.
>
> However, dpm_wait_for_consumers() and dpm_wait_for_suppliers() doesn't
> check this flag before triggering dpm_wait, leading to potential hang
> during suspend/resume.
>
> This can be reproduced on MT8186 Corsola Chromebook with devicetree like:
>
> usb-a-connector {
> compatible = "usb-a-connector";
> port {
> usb_a_con: endpoint {
> remote-endpoint = <&usb_hs>;
> };
> };
> };
>
> usb_host {
> compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-xhci", "mediatek,mtk-xhci";
> port {
> usb_hs: endpoint {
> remote-endpoint = <&usb_a_con>;
> };
> };
> };
>
> In this case, the two nodes form a cycle and a SYNC_STATE_ONLY devlink
> between usb_host (supplier) and usb-a-connector (consumer) is created.
>
> Use device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() to check this in
> dpm_wait_for_consumers() and dpm_wait_for_suppliers() to fix this.
>
> Fixes: 05ef983e0d65a ("driver core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag")
> Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Update commit message
> - Use device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only()
>
> drivers/base/power/main.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> index 2ea6e05e6ec9..73a1916170ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> @@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool async)
> * walking.
> */
> list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
> - if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
> + if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT &&
> + !device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(link->flags))
> dpm_wait(link->supplier, async);
>
> device_links_read_unlock(idx);
> @@ -339,7 +340,8 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async)
> * unregistration).
> */
> list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node)
> - if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
> + if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT &&
> + !device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(link->flags))
> dpm_wait(link->consumer, async);
>
> device_links_read_unlock(idx);
The way you use this new function does not require it to have been
exported to modules :(
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PM: sleep: Don't wait for SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links
2025-09-11 12:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-11 12:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2025-09-11 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Pin-yen Lin
Cc: Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Danilo Krummrich, Saravana Kannan,
Hsin-Te Yuan, linux-pm, Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-kernel
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 2:28 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 07:16:03PM +0800, Pin-yen Lin wrote:
> > Device links with DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY should not affect suspend
> > and resume, and functions like device_reorder_to_tail() and
> > device_link_add() doesn't try to reorder the consumers with such flag.
> >
> > However, dpm_wait_for_consumers() and dpm_wait_for_suppliers() doesn't
> > check this flag before triggering dpm_wait, leading to potential hang
> > during suspend/resume.
> >
> > This can be reproduced on MT8186 Corsola Chromebook with devicetree like:
> >
> > usb-a-connector {
> > compatible = "usb-a-connector";
> > port {
> > usb_a_con: endpoint {
> > remote-endpoint = <&usb_hs>;
> > };
> > };
> > };
> >
> > usb_host {
> > compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-xhci", "mediatek,mtk-xhci";
> > port {
> > usb_hs: endpoint {
> > remote-endpoint = <&usb_a_con>;
> > };
> > };
> > };
> >
> > In this case, the two nodes form a cycle and a SYNC_STATE_ONLY devlink
> > between usb_host (supplier) and usb-a-connector (consumer) is created.
> >
> > Use device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() to check this in
> > dpm_wait_for_consumers() and dpm_wait_for_suppliers() to fix this.
> >
> > Fixes: 05ef983e0d65a ("driver core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag")
> > Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Update commit message
> > - Use device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only()
> >
> > drivers/base/power/main.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > index 2ea6e05e6ec9..73a1916170ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > @@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool async)
> > * walking.
> > */
> > list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
> > - if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
> > + if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT &&
> > + !device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(link->flags))
> > dpm_wait(link->supplier, async);
> >
> > device_links_read_unlock(idx);
> > @@ -339,7 +340,8 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async)
> > * unregistration).
> > */
> > list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node)
> > - if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
> > + if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT &&
> > + !device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(link->flags))
> > dpm_wait(link->consumer, async);
> >
> > device_links_read_unlock(idx);
>
> The way you use this new function does not require it to have been
> exported to modules :(
Also, I'd just make it non-static (without exporting it to modules)
and use it in the same patch because the new usage is the reason for
exporting.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only()
2025-09-11 11:16 [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() Pin-yen Lin
2025-09-11 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PM: sleep: Don't wait for SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links Pin-yen Lin
2025-09-11 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-11 12:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2025-09-11 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pin-yen Lin
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
Danilo Krummrich, Saravana Kannan, Hsin-Te Yuan, linux-pm,
Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-kernel
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:21 PM Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() for future patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - New in v2
>
> drivers/base/core.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/device.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index d22d6b23e758..cc6af9b0d59d 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -287,10 +287,11 @@ static bool device_is_ancestor(struct device *dev, struct device *target)
> #define DL_MARKER_FLAGS (DL_FLAG_INFERRED | \
> DL_FLAG_CYCLE | \
> DL_FLAG_MANAGED)
> -static inline bool device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(u32 flags)
> +bool device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(u32 flags)
> {
> return (flags & ~DL_MARKER_FLAGS) == DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only);
As Greg said, this isn't necessary.
>
> /**
> * device_is_dependent - Check if one device depends on another one
> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index 0470d19da7f2..e27d0bf7c43d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -1197,6 +1197,7 @@ const char *dev_driver_string(const struct device *dev);
> struct device_link *device_link_add(struct device *consumer,
> struct device *supplier, u32 flags);
> void device_link_del(struct device_link *link);
> +bool device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(u32 flags);
No, you only need it in drivers/base/base.h
> void device_link_remove(void *consumer, struct device *supplier);
> void device_links_supplier_sync_state_pause(void);
> void device_links_supplier_sync_state_resume(void);
> --
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-11 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-11 11:16 [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() Pin-yen Lin
2025-09-11 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PM: sleep: Don't wait for SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links Pin-yen Lin
2025-09-11 12:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-11 12:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-11 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Export device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-11 12:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox