Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] powercap: intel_rapl_tpmi: Handle PMU registration failure during probe
@ 2026-05-15 18:42 Sumeet Pawnikar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sumeet Pawnikar @ 2026-05-15 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rafael, linux-pm; +Cc: linux-kernel, sumeet4linux

intel_rapl_tpmi_probe() invokes rapl_package_add_pmu() but it ignores
the return value, so a PMU registration failure may leave the driver
reporting probe success despite the PMU being absent, with no log
trace. Worse case scenario, the previously-added RAPL package would
not be torn down.

Add check for the return value, log the failure, undo the package
addition with rapl_remove_package() and fail the probe.

Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet4linux@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
index 7f41491d9cd1..8bc95310b542 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
@@ -414,7 +414,14 @@ static int intel_rapl_tpmi_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev,
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	rapl_package_add_pmu(trp->rp);
+	ret = rapl_package_add_pmu(trp->rp);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&auxdev->dev, "Failed to add RAPL PMU for Package%d, %d\n",
+			info->package_id, ret);
+		rapl_remove_package(trp->rp);
+		trp->rp = NULL;
+		goto err;
+	}
 
 	auxiliary_set_drvdata(auxdev, trp);
 
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-05-15 18:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-15 18:42 [PATCH] powercap: intel_rapl_tpmi: Handle PMU registration failure during probe Sumeet Pawnikar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox