Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:45:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2621899b-4c0b-e78d-5432-1993a3d295f1@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180110144631.GE3626@vireshk-i7>



On 10/01/18 14:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-01-18, 16:49, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> The dependency on physical_package_id from the topology to get the
>> cluster identifier is wrong. The concept of cluster used in ARM topology
>> is unfortunately not well defined in the architecture, we should avoid
>> using it. Further the frequency domain need not be mapped to so called
>> "clusters" one to one.
>>
>> SCPI already provides means to obtain the frequency domain id from the
>> device tree. In order to support some new topologies(e.g. DSU which
>> contains 2 frequency domains within the physical cluster), pseudo
>> clusters are created to make this driver work which is wrong again.
>>
>> In order to solve those issues and also remove dependency of topological
>> physical id for frequency domain, this patch removes the arm_big_little
>> dependency from scpi driver.
>>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 178 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> 

Thanks :)

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

      reply	other threads:[~2018-01-10 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-09 16:49 [PATCH 0/2] drivers: remove incorrect usage/dependency on topology_physical_package_id Sudeep Holla
2018-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] drivers: psci: remove cluster terminology and dependency on physical_package_id Sudeep Holla
2018-01-09 17:34   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-01-09 18:42     ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10  4:19   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-01-10 11:34     ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 14:46   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-01-10 16:45     ` Sudeep Holla [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2621899b-4c0b-e78d-5432-1993a3d295f1@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox