From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: psci: remove cluster terminology and dependency on physical_package_id
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 18:42:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <308ce839-5427-0f75-9c99-d40dcb9340c5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180109173451.GB17222@red-moon>
Hi Lorenzo,
On 09/01/18 17:34, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 04:49:27PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Since the definition of the term "cluster" is not well defined in the
>> architecture, we should avoid using it. Also the physical package id
>> is currently mapped to so called "clusters" in ARM/ARM64 platforms which
>> is already argumentative.
>
> I think we should describe why the PSCI checker uses the physical
> package id (ie because it is likely that power domains map to "clusters"
> - so physical package id *current* boundaries, it is trying to test
> "cluster" idle states) but I can easily rework the log before sending it
> upstream.
>
I agree. If I need to resend 2/2 based on review I will update the log
accordingly with acked-by tag. Otherwise, you can pick it up and update
the log.
> I will send it upstream for the next cycle along with patch (2), or
> if you prefer to send it yourself:
>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>
> Thanks for putting it together,
> Lorenzo
>
>> This patch removes the dependency on physical_package_id from the topology
>> in this PSCI checker. Also it replaces all the occurences of clusters to
>> cpu_groups which is derived from core_sibling_mask and may not directly
>> map to physical "cluster".
>>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c b/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c
>> index f3f4f810e5df..bb1c068bff19 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c
>> @@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ static int psci_ops_check(void)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int find_clusters(const struct cpumask *cpus,
>> - const struct cpumask **clusters)
>> +static int find_cpu_groups(const struct cpumask *cpus,
>> + const struct cpumask **cpu_groups)
>> {
>> unsigned int nb = 0;
>> cpumask_var_t tmp;
>> @@ -88,11 +88,11 @@ static int find_clusters(const struct cpumask *cpus,
>> cpumask_copy(tmp, cpus);
>>
>> while (!cpumask_empty(tmp)) {
>> - const struct cpumask *cluster =
>> + const struct cpumask *cpu_group =
>> topology_core_cpumask(cpumask_any(tmp));
>>
>> - clusters[nb++] = cluster;
>> - cpumask_andnot(tmp, tmp, cluster);
>> + cpu_groups[nb++] = cpu_group;
>> + cpumask_andnot(tmp, tmp, cpu_group);
>> }
>>
>> free_cpumask_var(tmp);
>> @@ -170,24 +170,24 @@ static int hotplug_tests(void)
>> {
>> int err;
>> cpumask_var_t offlined_cpus;
>> - int i, nb_cluster;
>> - const struct cpumask **clusters;
>> + int i, nb_cpu_group;
>> + const struct cpumask **cpu_groups;
>> char *page_buf;
>>
>> err = -ENOMEM;
>> if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&offlined_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
>> return err;
>> - /* We may have up to nb_available_cpus clusters. */
>> - clusters = kmalloc_array(nb_available_cpus, sizeof(*clusters),
>> - GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!clusters)
>> + /* We may have up to nb_available_cpus cpu_groups. */
>> + cpu_groups = kmalloc_array(nb_available_cpus, sizeof(*cpu_groups),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!cpu_groups)
>> goto out_free_cpus;
>> page_buf = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!page_buf)
>> - goto out_free_clusters;
>> + goto out_free_cpu_groups;
>>
>> err = 0;
>> - nb_cluster = find_clusters(cpu_online_mask, clusters);
>> + nb_cpu_group = find_cpu_groups(cpu_online_mask, cpu_groups);
>>
>> /*
>> * Of course the last CPU cannot be powered down and cpu_down() should
>> @@ -197,24 +197,22 @@ static int hotplug_tests(void)
>> err += down_and_up_cpus(cpu_online_mask, offlined_cpus);
>>
>> /*
>> - * Take down CPUs by cluster this time. When the last CPU is turned
>> - * off, the cluster itself should shut down.
>> + * Take down CPUs by cpu group this time. When the last CPU is turned
>> + * off, the cpu group itself should shut down.
>> */
>> - for (i = 0; i < nb_cluster; ++i) {
>> - int cluster_id =
>> - topology_physical_package_id(cpumask_any(clusters[i]));
>> + for (i = 0; i < nb_cpu_group; ++i) {
>> ssize_t len = cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, page_buf,
>> - clusters[i]);
>> + cpu_groups[i]);
>> /* Remove trailing newline. */
>> page_buf[len - 1] = '\0';
>> - pr_info("Trying to turn off and on again cluster %d "
>> - "(CPUs %s)\n", cluster_id, page_buf);
>> - err += down_and_up_cpus(clusters[i], offlined_cpus);
>> + pr_info("Trying to turn off and on again group %d (CPUs %s)\n",
>> + i, page_buf);
>> + err += down_and_up_cpus(cpu_groups[i], offlined_cpus);
>> }
>>
>> free_page((unsigned long)page_buf);
>> -out_free_clusters:
>> - kfree(clusters);
>> +out_free_cpu_groups:
>> + kfree(cpu_groups);
>> out_free_cpus:
>> free_cpumask_var(offlined_cpus);
>> return err;
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-09 16:49 [PATCH 0/2] drivers: remove incorrect usage/dependency on topology_physical_package_id Sudeep Holla
2018-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] drivers: psci: remove cluster terminology and dependency on physical_package_id Sudeep Holla
2018-01-09 17:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-01-09 18:42 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2018-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 4:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-01-10 11:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 14:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-01-10 16:45 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=308ce839-5427-0f75-9c99-d40dcb9340c5@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox