public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange freq QoS updates using __free()
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 15:52:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3026597.e9J7NaK4W3@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5028967.GXAFRqVoOG@rafael.j.wysocki>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Move the code from the for_each_possible_cpu() loop in update_qos_request()
to a separate function and use __free() for cpufreq policy reference
counting in it to avoid having to call cpufreq_cpu_put() repeatedly (or
using goto).

While at it, rename update_qos_request() to update_qos_requests()
because it updates multiple requests in one go.

No intentional functional impact.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAJZ5v0gN1T5woSF0tO=TbAh+2-sWzxFjWyDbB7wG2TFCOU01iQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -1693,43 +1693,42 @@ unlock_driver:
 	return count;
 }
 
-static void update_qos_request(enum freq_qos_req_type type)
+static void update_cpu_qos_request(int cpunum, enum freq_qos_req_type type)
 {
+	struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpunum];
 	struct freq_qos_request *req;
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-	int i;
+	unsigned int freq, perf_pct;
 
-	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
-		struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[i];
-		unsigned int freq, perf_pct;
-
-		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(i);
-		if (!policy)
-			continue;
-
-		req = policy->driver_data;
-		if (!req) {
-			cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		if (hwp_active)
-			intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap(cpu);
-
-		if (type == FREQ_QOS_MIN) {
-			perf_pct = global.min_perf_pct;
-		} else {
-			req++;
-			perf_pct = global.max_perf_pct;
-		}
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpunum);
+	if (!policy)
+		return;
+
+	req = policy->driver_data;
+	if (!req)
+		return;
+
+	if (hwp_active)
+		intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap(cpu);
+
+	if (type == FREQ_QOS_MIN) {
+		perf_pct = global.min_perf_pct;
+	} else {
+		req++;
+		perf_pct = global.max_perf_pct;
+	}
 
-		freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(cpu->pstate.turbo_freq * perf_pct, 100);
+	freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(cpu->pstate.turbo_freq * perf_pct, 100);
 
-		if (freq_qos_update_request(req, freq) < 0)
-			pr_warn("Failed to update freq constraint: CPU%d\n", i);
+	if (freq_qos_update_request(req, freq) < 0)
+		pr_warn("Failed to update freq constraint: CPU%d\n", cpunum);
+}
 
-		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-	}
+static void update_qos_requests(enum freq_qos_req_type type)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+		update_cpu_qos_request(i, type);
 }
 
 static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct kobj_attribute *b,
@@ -1758,7 +1757,7 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct
 	if (intel_pstate_driver == &intel_pstate)
 		intel_pstate_update_policies();
 	else
-		update_qos_request(FREQ_QOS_MAX);
+		update_qos_requests(FREQ_QOS_MAX);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_driver_lock);
 
@@ -1792,7 +1791,7 @@ static ssize_t store_min_perf_pct(struct
 	if (intel_pstate_driver == &intel_pstate)
 		intel_pstate_update_policies();
 	else
-		update_qos_request(FREQ_QOS_MIN);
+		update_qos_requests(FREQ_QOS_MIN);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_driver_lock);
 




  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05 13:51 [PATCH v1 0/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: A fix, a __free()-based simplification, and a follow-up adjustment Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-05 13:52 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix object lifecycle issue in update_qos_request() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-08  0:41   ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-09-08  0:53   ` [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange freq QoS updates using __free() Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-08 18:10     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-09  0:47       ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 13:53 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Adjust frequency percentage computations Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-08  1:12   ` [PATCH v1 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Adjust frequency percentage Zihuan Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3026597.e9J7NaK4W3@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox