From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange freq QoS updates using __free()
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 15:52:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3026597.e9J7NaK4W3@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5028967.GXAFRqVoOG@rafael.j.wysocki>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Move the code from the for_each_possible_cpu() loop in update_qos_request()
to a separate function and use __free() for cpufreq policy reference
counting in it to avoid having to call cpufreq_cpu_put() repeatedly (or
using goto).
While at it, rename update_qos_request() to update_qos_requests()
because it updates multiple requests in one go.
No intentional functional impact.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAJZ5v0gN1T5woSF0tO=TbAh+2-sWzxFjWyDbB7wG2TFCOU01iQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -1693,43 +1693,42 @@ unlock_driver:
return count;
}
-static void update_qos_request(enum freq_qos_req_type type)
+static void update_cpu_qos_request(int cpunum, enum freq_qos_req_type type)
{
+ struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpunum];
struct freq_qos_request *req;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
- int i;
+ unsigned int freq, perf_pct;
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[i];
- unsigned int freq, perf_pct;
-
- policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(i);
- if (!policy)
- continue;
-
- req = policy->driver_data;
- if (!req) {
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
- continue;
- }
-
- if (hwp_active)
- intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap(cpu);
-
- if (type == FREQ_QOS_MIN) {
- perf_pct = global.min_perf_pct;
- } else {
- req++;
- perf_pct = global.max_perf_pct;
- }
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpunum);
+ if (!policy)
+ return;
+
+ req = policy->driver_data;
+ if (!req)
+ return;
+
+ if (hwp_active)
+ intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap(cpu);
+
+ if (type == FREQ_QOS_MIN) {
+ perf_pct = global.min_perf_pct;
+ } else {
+ req++;
+ perf_pct = global.max_perf_pct;
+ }
- freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(cpu->pstate.turbo_freq * perf_pct, 100);
+ freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(cpu->pstate.turbo_freq * perf_pct, 100);
- if (freq_qos_update_request(req, freq) < 0)
- pr_warn("Failed to update freq constraint: CPU%d\n", i);
+ if (freq_qos_update_request(req, freq) < 0)
+ pr_warn("Failed to update freq constraint: CPU%d\n", cpunum);
+}
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
- }
+static void update_qos_requests(enum freq_qos_req_type type)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+ update_cpu_qos_request(i, type);
}
static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct kobj_attribute *b,
@@ -1758,7 +1757,7 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct
if (intel_pstate_driver == &intel_pstate)
intel_pstate_update_policies();
else
- update_qos_request(FREQ_QOS_MAX);
+ update_qos_requests(FREQ_QOS_MAX);
mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_driver_lock);
@@ -1792,7 +1791,7 @@ static ssize_t store_min_perf_pct(struct
if (intel_pstate_driver == &intel_pstate)
intel_pstate_update_policies();
else
- update_qos_request(FREQ_QOS_MIN);
+ update_qos_requests(FREQ_QOS_MIN);
mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_driver_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-05 13:51 [PATCH v1 0/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: A fix, a __free()-based simplification, and a follow-up adjustment Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-05 13:52 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix object lifecycle issue in update_qos_request() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-08 0:41 ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-09-08 0:53 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange freq QoS updates using __free() Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-08 18:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-09 0:47 ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 13:53 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Adjust frequency percentage computations Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-08 1:12 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Adjust frequency percentage Zihuan Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3026597.e9J7NaK4W3@rafael.j.wysocki \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox