From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: make cpufreq_boost_enabled return bool
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:57:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31841424-c6dd-49e2-ac2c-2394662b7f30@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240627060117.1809477-1-d-gole@ti.com>
On 6/27/2024 01:01, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> Since this function is supposed to return boost_enabled which is anyway
> a bool type make sure that it's return value is also marked as bool.
> This helps maintain better consistency in data types being used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
> "return false" instead of 0 as per Mario's suggestion.
>
> Link to previous patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20240626084354.1762483-1-d-gole@ti.com/
>
> ---
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 82c500389a40..709e7b1f9826 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2873,7 +2873,7 @@ int cpufreq_enable_boost_support(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_enable_boost_support);
>
> -int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
> +bool cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
> {
> return cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 20f7e98ee8af..6f57de7de433 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ ssize_t cpufreq_show_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, char *buf);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state);
> -int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void);
> +bool cpufreq_boost_enabled(void);
> int cpufreq_enable_boost_support(void);
> bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
>
> @@ -1164,9 +1164,9 @@ static inline int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -static inline int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
> +static inline bool cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
> {
> - return 0;
> + return false;
> }
>
> static inline int cpufreq_enable_boost_support(void)
>
> base-commit: df9574a57d02b265322e77fb8628d4d33641dda9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-27 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-27 6:01 [PATCH V2] cpufreq: make cpufreq_boost_enabled return bool Dhruva Gole
2024-06-27 18:57 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-06-28 18:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31841424-c6dd-49e2-ac2c-2394662b7f30@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox