Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* config SOC_DRA7XX?
@ 2013-07-14 14:54 Paul Bolle
  2013-07-15 11:37 ` Eduardo Valentin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2013-07-14 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eduardo Valentin, Zhang Rui; +Cc: linux-pm

0) Mainline commit 8926fa4f9b6160b1953ca44852d6044b58a829e1 ("thermal:
ti-soc-thermal: add thermal data for DRA752 chips") added a Kconfig
entry for DRA752_THERMAL.

1) That symbol depends on SOC_DRA7XX. But SOC_DRA7XX doesn't exist. This
means that currently the code depending on DRA752_THERMAL can't be
build.

2) Why is this dependency on SOC_DRA7XX needed? And what would
SOC_DRA7XX actually be? Some searches on the web returned nothing that
could show me what it is.


Paul Bolle


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: config SOC_DRA7XX?
  2013-07-14 14:54 config SOC_DRA7XX? Paul Bolle
@ 2013-07-15 11:37 ` Eduardo Valentin
  2013-07-15 12:01   ` Paul Bolle
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Valentin @ 2013-07-15 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Bolle; +Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Zhang Rui, linux-pm

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 991 bytes --]

Hi Paul,

On 14-07-2013 10:54, Paul Bolle wrote:
> 0) Mainline commit 8926fa4f9b6160b1953ca44852d6044b58a829e1 ("thermal:
> ti-soc-thermal: add thermal data for DRA752 chips") added a Kconfig
> entry for DRA752_THERMAL.
> 
> 1) That symbol depends on SOC_DRA7XX. But SOC_DRA7XX doesn't exist. This
> means that currently the code depending on DRA752_THERMAL can't be
> build.
> 
> 2) Why is this dependency on SOC_DRA7XX needed? And what would
> SOC_DRA7XX actually be? Some searches on the web returned nothing that
> could show me what it is.

That is the config which says the kernel has the support for the DRA7XX
soc family. The core support didnt make for 3.11. But I had already sent
this code for review and merge by then. The core code can be seen here:
git://github.com/rrnayak/linux.git for-3.12/dra-core-data

for instance.

> 
> 
> Paul Bolle
> 
> 
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: config SOC_DRA7XX?
  2013-07-15 11:37 ` Eduardo Valentin
@ 2013-07-15 12:01   ` Paul Bolle
  2013-07-16 21:02     ` Eduardo Valentin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2013-07-15 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eduardo Valentin; +Cc: Zhang Rui, linux-pm

Hi Eduardo,

On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 07:37 -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On 14-07-2013 10:54, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > 2) Why is this dependency on SOC_DRA7XX needed? And what would
> > SOC_DRA7XX actually be? Some searches on the web returned nothing that
> > could show me what it is.
> 
> That is the config which says the kernel has the support for the DRA7XX
> soc family. The core support didnt make for 3.11. But I had already sent
> this code for review and merge by then. The core code can be seen here:
> git://github.com/rrnayak/linux.git for-3.12/dra-core-data
> 
> for instance.

I'll stop worrying about this. And unless SOC_DRA7XX still pops up in my
list of invalid Kconfig symbols in, say, early 2014, I won't have to
bother you again.

Thanks!


Paul Bolle


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: config SOC_DRA7XX?
  2013-07-15 12:01   ` Paul Bolle
@ 2013-07-16 21:02     ` Eduardo Valentin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Valentin @ 2013-07-16 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Bolle; +Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Zhang Rui, linux-pm

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1139 bytes --]

On 15-07-2013 08:01, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
> 
> On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 07:37 -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> On 14-07-2013 10:54, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>> 2) Why is this dependency on SOC_DRA7XX needed? And what would
>>> SOC_DRA7XX actually be? Some searches on the web returned nothing that
>>> could show me what it is.
>>
>> That is the config which says the kernel has the support for the DRA7XX
>> soc family. The core support didnt make for 3.11. But I had already sent
>> this code for review and merge by then. The core code can be seen here:
>> git://github.com/rrnayak/linux.git for-3.12/dra-core-data
>>
>> for instance.
> 
> I'll stop worrying about this. And unless SOC_DRA7XX still pops up in my
> list of invalid Kconfig symbols in, say, early 2014, I won't have to
> bother you again.

Thanks Paul for point me this missing part. But I believe it won't be
something to worry, yes, because Rajendra will be sending DRA7 base
support for 3.12.

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Paul Bolle
> 
> 
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-16 21:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-14 14:54 config SOC_DRA7XX? Paul Bolle
2013-07-15 11:37 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-15 12:01   ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-16 21:02     ` Eduardo Valentin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox