Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sched/idle: Make default_idle_call() NOHZ aware
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2026 22:21:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6250711.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260304030306.uk5c63xw4oqvjffb@airbuntu>

On Wednesday, March 4, 2026 4:03:06 AM CET Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 03/02/26 22:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 12:04 PM Christian Loehle
> > <christian.loehle@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/1/26 19:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > Guests fall back to default_idle_call() as there is no cpuidle driver
> > > > available to them by default. That causes a problem in fully loaded
> > > > scenarios where CPUs go briefly idle for a couple of microseconds:
> > > >
> > > > tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() is invoked unconditionally which means unless
> > > > there is timer pending in the next tick, the tick is stopped and a couple
> > > > of microseconds later when the idle condition goes away restarted. That
> > > > requires to program the clockevent device twice which implies a VM exit for
> > > > each reprogramming.
> > > >
> > > > It was suggested to remove the tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() invocation from
> > > > the default idle code, but would be counterproductive. It would not allow
> > > > the host to go into deeper idle states when the guest CPU is fully idle as
> > > > it has to maintain the periodic tick.
> > > >
> > > > Cure this by implementing a trivial moving average filter which keeps track
> > > > of the recent idle recidency time and only stop the tick when the average
> > > > is larger than a tick.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  kernel/sched/idle.c |   65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > >  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> > > > @@ -105,12 +105,7 @@ static inline void cond_tick_broadcast_e
> > > >  static inline void cond_tick_broadcast_exit(void) { }
> > > >  #endif /* !CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST_IDLE */
> > > >
> > > > -/**
> > > > - * default_idle_call - Default CPU idle routine.
> > > > - *
> > > > - * To use when the cpuidle framework cannot be used.
> > > > - */
> > > > -static void __cpuidle default_idle_call(void)
> > > > +static void __cpuidle __default_idle_call(void)
> > > >  {
> > > >       instrumentation_begin();
> > > >       if (!current_clr_polling_and_test()) {
> > > > @@ -130,6 +125,61 @@ static void __cpuidle default_idle_call(
> > > >       instrumentation_end();
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> > > > +
> > > > +/* Limit to 4 entries so it fits in a cache line */
> > > > +#define IDLE_DUR_ENTRIES     4
> > > > +#define IDLE_DUR_MASK                (IDLE_DUR_ENTRIES - 1)
> > > > +
> > > > +struct idle_nohz_data {
> > > > +     u64             duration[IDLE_DUR_ENTRIES];
> > > > +     u64             entry_time;
> > > > +     u64             sum;
> > > > +     unsigned int    idx;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct idle_nohz_data, nohz_data);
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * default_idle_call - Default CPU idle routine.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * To use when the cpuidle framework cannot be used.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void default_idle_call(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct idle_nohz_data *nd = this_cpu_ptr(&nohz_data);
> > > > +     unsigned int idx = nd->idx;
> > > > +     s64 delta;
> > > > +
> > > > +     /*
> > > > +      * If the CPU spends more than a tick on average in idle, try to stop
> > > > +      * the tick.
> > > > +      */
> > > > +     if (nd->sum > TICK_NSEC * IDLE_DUR_ENTRIES)
> > > > +             tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
> > > > +
> > > > +     __default_idle_call();
> > > > +
> > > > +     /*
> > > > +      * Build a moving average of the time spent in idle to prevent stopping
> > > > +      * the tick on a loaded system which only goes idle briefly.
> > > > +      */
> > > > +     delta = max(sched_clock() - nd->entry_time, 0);
> > > > +     nd->sum += delta - nd->duration[idx];
> > > > +     nd->duration[idx] = delta;
> > > > +     nd->idx = (idx + 1) & IDLE_DUR_MASK;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void default_idle_enter(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     this_cpu_write(nohz_data.entry_time, sched_clock());
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +#else  /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
> > > > +static inline void default_idle_call(void { __default_idle_call(); }
> > > > +static inline void default_idle_enter(void) { }
> > > > +#endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
> > > > +
> > > >  static int call_cpuidle_s2idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> > > >                              struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> > > >                              u64 max_latency_ns)
> > > > @@ -186,8 +236,6 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > >       if (cpuidle_not_available(drv, dev)) {
> > > > -             tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
> > > > -
> > > >               default_idle_call();
> > > >               goto exit_idle;
> > > >       }
> > > > @@ -276,6 +324,7 @@ static void do_idle(void)
> > > >
> > > >       __current_set_polling();
> > > >       tick_nohz_idle_enter();
> > > > +     default_idle_enter();
> > > >
> > > >       while (!need_resched()) {
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > How does this work? We don't stop the tick until the average idle time is larger,
> > > but if we don't stop the tick how is that possible?
> > >
> > > Why don't we just require one or two consecutive tick wakeups before stopping?
> > 
> > Exactly my thought and I think one should be sufficient.
> 
> I concur. From our experience with TEO util threshold these averages can
> backfire. I think one tick is sufficient delay to not be obviously broken.

So if I'm not mistaken, it would be something like the appended prototype
(completely untested, but it builds for me).

---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c |   10 ----------
 kernel/sched/idle.c       |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -359,16 +359,6 @@ noinstr int cpuidle_enter_state(struct c
 int cpuidle_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 		   bool *stop_tick)
 {
-	/*
-	 * If there is only a single idle state (or none), there is nothing
-	 * meaningful for the governor to choose. Skip the governor and
-	 * always use state 0 with the tick running.
-	 */
-	if (drv->state_count <= 1) {
-		*stop_tick = false;
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	return cpuidle_curr_governor->select(drv, dev, stop_tick);
 }
 
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -161,6 +161,14 @@ static int call_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_d
 	return cpuidle_enter(drv, dev, next_state);
 }
 
+static void idle_call_stop_or_retain_tick(bool stop_tick)
+{
+	if (stop_tick || tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
+		tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
+	else
+		tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick();
+}
+
 /**
  * cpuidle_idle_call - the main idle function
  *
@@ -170,7 +178,7 @@ static int call_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_d
  * set, and it returns with polling set.  If it ever stops polling, it
  * must clear the polling bit.
  */
-static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
+static void cpuidle_idle_call(bool got_tick)
 {
 	struct cpuidle_device *dev = cpuidle_get_device();
 	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev);
@@ -186,7 +194,7 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
 	}
 
 	if (cpuidle_not_available(drv, dev)) {
-		tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
+		idle_call_stop_or_retain_tick(!got_tick);
 
 		default_idle_call();
 		goto exit_idle;
@@ -221,7 +229,7 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
 
 		next_state = cpuidle_find_deepest_state(drv, dev, max_latency_ns);
 		call_cpuidle(drv, dev, next_state);
-	} else {
+	} else if (drv->state_count > 1) {
 		bool stop_tick = true;
 
 		/*
@@ -229,16 +237,22 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
 		 */
 		next_state = cpuidle_select(drv, dev, &stop_tick);
 
-		if (stop_tick || tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
-			tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
-		else
-			tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick();
+		idle_call_stop_or_retain_tick(stop_tick);
 
 		entered_state = call_cpuidle(drv, dev, next_state);
 		/*
 		 * Give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome
 		 */
 		cpuidle_reflect(dev, entered_state);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * If there is only a single idle state (or none), there is
+		 * nothing meaningful for the governor to choose.  Skip the
+		 * governor and always use state 0.
+		 */
+		idle_call_stop_or_retain_tick(!got_tick);
+
+		call_cpuidle(drv, dev, 0);
 	}
 
 exit_idle:
@@ -259,6 +273,7 @@ exit_idle:
 static void do_idle(void)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	bool got_tick = false;
 
 	/*
 	 * Check if we need to update blocked load
@@ -329,8 +344,9 @@ static void do_idle(void)
 			tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick();
 			cpu_idle_poll();
 		} else {
-			cpuidle_idle_call();
+			cpuidle_idle_call(got_tick);
 		}
+		got_tick = tick_nohz_idle_got_tick();
 		arch_cpu_idle_exit();
 	}
 




       reply	other threads:[~2026-03-06 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260301191959.406218221@kernel.org>
     [not found] ` <CAJZ5v0h-bGU34d9OnhYqdzz+5UiKV1rBEB9NS-TL4=sK2jf-LQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <20260304030306.uk5c63xw4oqvjffb@airbuntu>
2026-03-06 21:21     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-03-06 21:31       ` [patch 2/2] sched/idle: Make default_idle_call() NOHZ aware Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-07 16:25         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-10  3:54           ` Qais Yousef
2026-03-10  9:18             ` Christian Loehle
2026-03-10 15:03               ` Qais Yousef
2026-03-10 15:09                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-10 15:14                   ` Qais Yousef
2026-03-07 16:12     ` [PATCH v1] sched: idle: Make skipping governor callbacks more consistent Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-09  9:13       ` Christian Loehle
2026-03-09 12:26         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-10  3:57           ` Qais Yousef
2026-03-09 12:44       ` Aboorva Devarajan
2026-03-10 14:28       ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6250711.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox