Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: qianfan <qianfanguijin@163.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drivers: cpufreq: sun8i-r40: Add cpufreq support
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 18:20:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <932f3d62-21d2-dc3c-ff0f-f77477f4e8e9@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509092740.qmpizwxappy77ggc@houat>



在 2022/5/9 17:27, Maxime Ripard 写道:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:48:53PM +0800, qianfanguijin@163.com wrote:
>> From: qianfan Zhao <qianfanguijin@163.com>
>>
>> OPP table value is get from allwinner lichee 3.10 kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: qianfan Zhao <qianfanguijin@163.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi     | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi
>> index 291f4784e86c..90de119095fa 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi
>> @@ -54,6 +54,41 @@ / {
>>   	#size-cells = <1>;
>>   	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>>   
>> +	cpu0_opp_table: opp_table0 {
>> +		compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> +		opp-shared;
>> +
>> +		opp-720000000 {
>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <720000000>;
>> +			opp-microvolt = <1000000 1000000 1300000>;
>> +			clock-latency-ns = <2000000>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		opp-912000000 {
>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <912000000>;
>> +			opp-microvolt = <1100000 1100000 1300000>;
>> +			clock-latency-ns = <2000000>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		opp-1008000000 {
>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>> +			opp-microvolt = <1160000 1160000 1300000>;
>> +			clock-latency-ns = <2000000>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		opp-1104000000 {
>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1104000000>;
>> +			opp-microvolt = <1240000 1240000 1300000>;
>> +			clock-latency-ns = <2000000>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		opp-1200000000 {
>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>> +			opp-microvolt = <1300000 1300000 1300000>;
>> +			clock-latency-ns = <2000000>;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
> How were these OPPs tested? If you didn't, please test with
> https://github.com/ssvb/cpuburn-arm/blob/master/cpufreq-ljt-stress-test
Thanks for yours guide. Next it the log:
root@ubuntu:~/cpuburn-arm-master# ./cpufreq-ljt-stress-test
Creating './whitenoise-1920x1080.jpg' ... done
CPU stress test, which is doing JPEG decoding by libjpeg-turbo
at different cpufreq operating points.

Testing CPU 0
  1200 MHz ............................................................ OK
  1104 MHz ............................................................ OK
  1008 MHz ............................................................ OK
   912 MHz ............................................................ OK
   720 MHz ............................................................ OK

Testing CPU 1
  1200 MHz ............................................................ OK
  1104 MHz ............................................................ OK
  1008 MHz ............................................................ OK
   912 MHz ............................................................ OK
   720 MHz ............................................................ OK

Testing CPU 2
  1200 MHz ............................................................ OK
  1104 MHz ............................................................ OK
  1008 MHz ............................................................ OK
   912 MHz ............................................................ OK
   720 MHz ............................................................ OK

Testing CPU 3
  1200 MHz ............................................................ OK
  1104 MHz ............................................................ OK
  1008 MHz ............................................................ OK
   912 MHz ............................................................ OK
   720 MHz ............................................................ OK

Overall result : PASSED
>
> And report the results
>
> Also, U-Boot sets the 1008MHz OPP by default, and the voltage to match.
> How is this going to play out on device tree where the CPU regulators
> aren't set?
I tested this patch on my custom board now, and cpu is powered by dcdc2.
So I add cpu-supply in dts on my custom board:

&cpu0 {
     cpu-supply = <&reg_dcdc2>;
};

I think I can add cpu-supply to the others.
>
> Maxime


      reply	other threads:[~2022-05-09 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-09  8:48 [PATCH v1] drivers: cpufreq: sun8i-r40: Add cpufreq support qianfanguijin
2022-05-09  9:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-09  9:23   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-05-09  9:31     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-09  9:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-05-09 10:20   ` qianfan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=932f3d62-21d2-dc3c-ff0f-f77477f4e8e9@163.com \
    --to=qianfanguijin@163.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox