Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: intel_pstate: Fix wrong definition of Disable Energy Efficiency Optimization bit
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:32:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CDD74CD9-4DF0-4403-8140-12008DB86E7A@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1825fdb9b1c9d759bcfefa7ef80a380cd9ece78.camel@linux.intel.com>



> On 15 Apr 2019, at 5:00, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 23:48 +0300, Liran Alon wrote:
>> Bit definition can be found in Intel SDM Section 2.16 MSRS IN THE 6TH
>> GENERATION, 7TH GENERATION AND 8TH GENERATION
>> INTEL® CORE™ PROCESSORS, INTEL® XEON® PROCESSOR SCALABLE
>> FAMILY, AND FUTURE INTEL® CORE™ PROCESSORS.
>> 
>> Definition of all Skylake MSR_POWER_CTL bits can also be found at
>> EDK2
>> source at UefiCpuPkg/Include/Register/Msr/SkylakeMsr.h union
>> MSR_SKYLAKE_POWER_CTL_REGISTER.
>> 
>> Fixes: 6e978b22efa1 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Disable energy
>> efficiency optimization")
> What are you trying to address? This bit 19 has a special meaning when
> system is in HWP mode. So this is correct.
> 
> Bit 20 has a different meaning depending on legacy or in HWP mode.
> 
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
> 

Maybe I’m misinterpreting Intel SDM, but it seems to me that bit 19 in MSR_POWER_CTL is always "Disable Race to Halt Optimization (R/W)”
while bit 20 is the "Disable Energy Efficiency Optimization (R/W)”.

I didn’t find a place in Intel SDM where it is discussed that bit 19 have a special meaning when system is in HWP mode.
Can you point me to relevant place in Intel SDM?

Thanks,
-Liran


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-15  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-14 20:48 [PATCH 1/2] x86: intel_pstate: Fix wrong definition of Disable Energy Efficiency Optimization bit Liran Alon
2019-04-14 20:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: intel: Define MSR_POWER_CTL bits with symbolic constants Liran Alon
2019-04-15  2:10   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2019-04-15  8:35     ` Liran Alon
2019-04-15  2:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: intel_pstate: Fix wrong definition of Disable Energy Efficiency Optimization bit Srinivas Pandruvada
2019-04-15  8:32   ` Liran Alon [this message]
2019-04-15 18:03     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2019-04-15 18:13       ` Liran Alon
2019-04-15 18:22         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2019-04-15 18:27           ` Liran Alon
2019-04-15 18:30             ` Srinivas Pandruvada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CDD74CD9-4DF0-4403-8140-12008DB86E7A@oracle.com \
    --to=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox