From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: "Kovacs, Alexander" <Alexander.Kovacs@amd.com>,
Freeman Z <SHD-ISAC@outlook.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"westeri@kernel.org" <westeri@kernel.org>,
"andreas.noever@gmail.com" <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
"YehezkelShB@gmail.com" <yehezkelshb@gmail.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"S, Sanath" <Sanath.S@amd.com>,
"Natikar, Basavaraj" <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>,
"Martinez, Juan" <Juan.Martinez@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] PCI/USB4: AMD Phoenix 1022:14ef runtime suspend prevents JHL9480 downstream enumeration
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:00:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eaaf891b-7b0b-4eea-b104-de2c0db7cb42@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL4PR12MB9533BF5ABF7035E6DF151C0A9C832@BL4PR12MB9533.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Freeman Z <SHD-ISAC@outlook.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2026 11:41 AM
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>; Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; westeri@kernel.org; andreas.noever@gmail.com; YehezkelShB@gmail.com; rafael@kernel.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; S, Sanath <Sanath.S@amd.com>; Natikar, Basavaraj <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>; Kovacs, Alexander <Alexander.Kovacs@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [BUG] PCI/USB4: AMD Phoenix 1022:14ef runtime suspend prevents JHL9480 downstream enumeration
>
> [You don't often get email from shd-isac@outlook.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Hi Mika, Mario,
>
> I reproduced the failure following the requested sequence on my installed CachyOS system with kernel 7.2.6-1-cachyos and thunderbolt.dyndbg=+p.
>
> For this trace the dock was physically disconnected at boot. I did not run lspci before or during the reproduction.
>
> Before plugging the dock:
>
> 0000:00:04.1
> power/control = auto
> power/runtime_status = suspended
> power_state = D3cold
>
> 0000:6b:00.6
> power/control = auto
> power/runtime_status = suspended
> power_state = D3cold
>
> After plugging the Kensington SD5000T5 and waiting about 15 seconds:
>
> 0000:00:04.1
> power/control = auto
> power/runtime_status = suspended
> power_state = D3cold
>
> 0000:09:00.0
> missing
>
> 0000:6b:00.6
> power/control = auto
> power/runtime_status = active
> power_state = D0
>
> The Thunderbolt dynamic debug log shows the NHI/control channel waking and the USB4 fabric being configured. In particular:
>
> thunderbolt 0000:6b:00.6: control channel starting...
> thunderbolt 0000:6b:00.6: 0: resuming switch
> thunderbolt 0000:6b:00.6: 0:2: is connected, link is up (state: 2)
> thunderbolt 0-2: Kensington SD5000T5 EQ Thunderbolt 5 Dock
> thunderbolt 0000:6b:00.6: 0:5 <-> 2:9 (PCI): activating
> thunderbolt 0000:6b:00.6: PCIe Down path activation complete
> thunderbolt 0000:6b:00.6: PCIe Up path activation complete
>
> However, I do not see a PME message corresponding to the dock insertion.
> The PME messages in the full dmesg are the early-boot
> "PME: Signaling with IRQ ..." initialization messages.
>
> So in this reproduction, the NHI at 0000:6b:00.6 wakes from D3cold to D0 and the Thunderbolt driver successfully programs the PCIe tunnel in the
> USB4 fabric, but the AMD 1022:14ef PCIe root port/tunnel at 0000:00:04.1 remains in D3cold and the downstream 0000:09:00.0 hierarchy never appears.
>
> I attached the full dmesg captured after the dock plug, plus the small before/after state files. I redacted only unrelated local network identifiers, the hostname, and filesystem/LUKS UUIDs; the Thunderbolt debug data and device UIDs are otherwise unchanged.
>
> This particular dynamic-debug trace was collected on CachyOS rather than the Arch stock kernel used for my earlier reproduction.
>
It sure sounds like a PME doesn't deliver properly for some reason.
I suppose that while in this state - if you ran lspci the root port at
0000:00:04.1 exits D3cold and 0000:09:00.0 shows up, right?
Does the PME show up in the logs after you've done this?
Any chance you can easily check Ubuntu 26.04.1 live media? There is a
7.0 based kernel there, and I would like to know if this regressed from
that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 12:39 [BUG] PCI/USB4: AMD Phoenix 1022:14ef runtime suspend prevents JHL9480 downstream enumeration Freeman Z
2026-09-21 5:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-09-21 15:24 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-09-22 16:40 ` Freeman Z
2026-09-22 17:02 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-09-22 17:03 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-09-22 19:54 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-09-22 20:00 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-09-23 11:51 ` Freeman Z
2026-09-23 12:26 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-09-23 12:35 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-09-23 19:37 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-09-24 7:18 ` Freeman Z
2026-09-25 5:27 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-09-25 9:38 ` Freeman Z
2026-09-25 11:31 ` Freeman Z
2026-09-25 11:50 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-09-25 14:10 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-09-25 15:12 ` Freeman Z
2026-09-25 15:24 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-09-25 15:48 ` Freeman Z
2026-10-01 14:54 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-10-01 18:28 ` Freeman Z
2026-10-05 14:35 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-10-05 15:39 ` Freeman Z
2026-10-05 17:01 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-10-05 17:10 ` Freeman Z
2026-10-06 14:33 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-10-06 14:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-10-06 16:33 ` Freeman Z
2026-10-06 17:12 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-10-06 18:45 ` Freeman Z
2026-10-06 19:18 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-10-06 19:33 ` Freeman Z
2026-10-06 19:53 ` Kovacs, Alexander
2026-10-06 21:04 ` Freeman Z
2026-09-25 14:03 ` Kovacs, Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eaaf891b-7b0b-4eea-b104-de2c0db7cb42@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Kovacs@amd.com \
--cc=Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com \
--cc=Juan.Martinez@amd.com \
--cc=SHD-ISAC@outlook.com \
--cc=Sanath.S@amd.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=westeri@kernel.org \
--cc=yehezkelshb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox