Re: Banyan Vines

[tony.chamberlain@lemko.com]

-----Original Message-----
From: James Carlson [mailto:carlsonj@workingcode.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 03:09 PM
To: 'Michael St. Laurent'
Cc: tony.chamberlain@lemko.com, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Banyan Vines

Michael St. Laurent writes:
> Might it not also be that the client connecting has the Banyan Vines
> protocol installed?

That's probably _really_ unlikely in 2008.  ;-}

Plus, the original poster noted that he had this:

> > > (along with a lot of unsupported protocol messages which are just
> > > hex values), or what to do about it?

That almost certainly makes Banyan Vines a red herring.  We just
happened to see a corrupted packet that started with hex 35 or 00 35.

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj@workingcode.com>

============
Especially since the VPN had been working (with mmpe or is it mppe?) for
6 or 7 months.

Could it be hackers?