Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: pwm: Convert lpc32xx-pwm.txt to YAML

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 01/04/2025 19:32, Purva Yeshi wrote:
> On 13/03/25 16:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/03/2025 13:27, Purva Yeshi wrote:
>>> Convert the existing `lpc32xx-pwm.txt` bindings documentation into a
>>> YAML schema (`nxp,lpc3220-pwm.yaml`).
>>>
>>> Set `"#pwm-cells"` to `const: 3` for expected PWM cell properties.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
>> are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
>> not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>>
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
>> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
>> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
>> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
>> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
>> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
>> tags received on the version they apply.
>>
>> Full context and explanation:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>> </form letter>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I wanted to follow up on the patch I submitted. I was wondering if you
> had a chance to review it and if there are any comments or feedback.

And what did you quote? What's there? Did you read it before replying?

Please avoid pinging during the merge window.


Best regards,
Krzysztof