From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PWM: PXA: add device tree support to PWM driver
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 01:00:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309170100.09282.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52375FDB.8090405@wwwdotorg.org>
Dear Stephen Warren,
> On 09/16/2013 09:10 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> ...
>
> > OK, to push it ad-absurdum, shall we not start listing every single
> > revision of the CPU as well? Like pxa250a0 250a1 etc ? Yes , this
> > many-to-one mapping is
>
> It's not about CPU revisions, it's about revisions of the SoC that
> contain the IP block.
But that doesn't matter if the IP block is the same in all of them.
> > something I don't quite understand, that's why I'd love to see a good
> > reasoning from Stephen.
>
> Please see the earlier discussions.
I did, so I must really be slow or something.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-16 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 16:54 [PATCH v3] PWM: PXA: add device tree support to PWM driver Mike Dunn
2013-09-15 14:07 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-16 14:42 ` Mike Dunn
2013-09-16 15:10 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-16 19:45 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-16 23:00 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-09-16 19:44 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-16 23:01 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-16 23:03 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-17 14:07 ` Mike Dunn
2013-09-17 16:17 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-17 18:56 ` Mike Dunn
2013-09-17 19:26 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201309170100.09282.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=chao.xie@marvell.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mikedunn@newsguy.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox