* [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 13/29] pwm: stm32-lp: Add check in case requested period cannot be achieved
[not found] <20191001164423.16406-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2019-10-01 16:44 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-10-01 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable
Cc: Fabrice Gasnier, Uwe Kleine-König, Thierry Reding,
Sasha Levin, linux-pwm
From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
[ Upstream commit c91e3234c6035baf5a79763cb4fcd5d23ce75c2b ]
LPTimer can use a 32KHz clock for counting. It depends on clock tree
configuration. In such a case, PWM output frequency range is limited.
Although unlikely, nothing prevents user from requesting a PWM frequency
above counting clock (32KHz for instance):
- This causes (prd - 1) = 0xffff to be written in ARR register later in
the apply() routine.
This results in badly configured PWM period (and also duty_cycle).
Add a check to report an error is such a case.
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
index 9793b296108ff..3f2e4ef695d75 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
/* Calculate the period and prescaler value */
div = (unsigned long long)clk_get_rate(priv->clk) * state->period;
do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ if (!div) {
+ /* Clock is too slow to achieve requested period. */
+ dev_dbg(priv->chip.dev, "Can't reach %u ns\n", state->period);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
prd = div;
while (div > STM32_LPTIM_MAX_ARR) {
presc++;
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread